Organizational Development during Mergers

Paper Summary:

This paper reviews the evolution of organizational development (OD) from its earliest years to its much wider present state, ending with its ability or lack thereof to address today's specific issues. The field of OD has had many ups and downs, including a rise in the 1960s, a downturn in the 1970s, and its recent updating into many forms. The current broader definition of OD suggests that it may be continue to play a role if it can alters enough to assume strategic roles in organizations to focus on core values to resolve problems that have been avoided or ignored over the years. This paper conducts a systematic review of relevant literature on OD and develops a theoretical framework concerning how OD can relate to changes that occur with mergers and acquisitions and culture.

Table of Contents
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Overview
1.2 Problem Definition
1.3 Research Objective
1.4 Research Questions
1.5 Research Methodology
1.6 Data Analysis Method
1.7 Thesis Structure
Chapter Two: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Background of the Telecommunications Sector and Job Satisfaction with Management
2.3 Overview of Motivation/Job Satisfaction Framework
2.4 Cases
Chapter Three: Research Design and Methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Problem Statement
3.3 Research Objective
3.4 Methodological Framework
3.4.1 Major Research Question(s)
3.4.2. Minor Research Question(s)
3.4.3 Limitations
3.6 Data Analysis Methods
Chapter Four: Data Analyses, Findings, and Discussion
4.1 Descriptive Analysis
4.2 Discussion and Findings
Chapter Five: Conclusion, Recommendations, and Further Research
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Recommendations
5.3 Further Research
Bibliography

From the Paper:

"There are many trends when it comes to employee motivation and compensation, because big business has determined that money is not the only thing that employees want. Instead, these employees are motivated by different things. It used to be that everyone assumed that employees wanted more money, and they could do any job forever, as long as they were given periodic raises and/or bonuses. In other words, the employer assumed that money was all that mattered to these people that worked for the company. However, employers eventually began to realize that praising employees made them smile, and having a casual day once a week for employees that worked on-site at the company made employees more relaxed. In addition, giving more freedom to employees that work in the field as part of an outside sales force also helps to keep them motivated."

Sample of Sources Used:

• Adams, A. & Sasse, M.A. (1999). Users Are Not The Enemy. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 40-46.
• Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
• Adams, K.L., & Galanges, G.J. (2005). Communicating in Groups. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Adler, P. A. & Adler, P. (1987). Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W. L., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 751-796.

More papers on Organizational Development during Mergers:

• Term Paper # 106392 : "Impact on Cultural Change During Mergers and Acquisitions"
• Research Paper # 62376 : "Change in the Energy Industry"
• Research Paper # 121611 : "Organizational Development and Change"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: