Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

International Relations


# 93460
International Relations
This paper explores the ideologies of liberalism and realism in the framework of international relations.
1,944 words (approx. 7.8 pages) | 12 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


Paper Summary:

The paper explains that the schools of liberalism and realism in terms of international relations have long been seen as warring ideologies, highly incompatible with one another. Liberalism and realism proceed from different fundamental interpretations about the international system. The paper explains, however, that both methods of international relations have as their ultimate goal the security and perpetuation of the state. The paper looks at Joseph Nye's theory of soft power versus the ideas of hard power. The paper demonstrates the threats facing the United States today and asserts that an ability to address or reduce such a threat depends upon liberalism merging with realism in order to ensure security.

From the Paper:

"In opening, a cursory evaluation of what constitutes the realist and liberal schools of thought needs to preface critiques of these systems. Realists come in many stripes, but all typically share the following assumptions. First, they believe that states are the primary actors in the international system, rational unitary actors who are functionally identical. Second, they assume that state preferences, ranging from survival to situational improvements, are fixed and unchanging. Third, they assume that the anarchic structure of the international system creates such a degree of either actual conflict or perceived uncertainty that states must constantly assume and prepare for the possibility of war (Waltz 1986). In this context, outcomes of state interactions are typically zero-sum and thus are determined by relative power. For realists, power is the currency of the international system. States interact with one another within that system like billiard balls: hard, opaque, unitary actors colliding with one another (Amin 2000)."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Amin, Samir, "The Political Economy of the Twentieth Century," Monthly Review, June 2000, http://www.monthlyreview.org/600amin.htm
  • Chong, Alan, "Singaporean Foreign Policy and the Asian Values Debate, 1992-2000: an experiment in soft power," The Pacific Review 17:1, 2004, pp. 95-133.
  • Fukuyama, Francis, "The End of History?" National Interest 16 Summer 1989, pp. 3-18.
  • Gambill, Gary, "The Balance of Terror: War by Other Means in the Middle East," Journal of Palestine Studies 28:1, 1998, pp. 51-66
  • Hoffman, Bruce, "The Logic of Suicide Terrorism," The Atlantic Monthly June 2003

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

International Relations (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-International-Relations/93460

MLA Citation:

"International Relations" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-International-Relations/93460>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 37.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

hicaliber US
Publisher Since:
Feb 28, 2007
We employ a large pool of writers that specialize in a variety of topics. In addition, they are all highly skilled researchers and editors. Our papers are of a very high quality and we have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success