Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Inmate Violence During Incarceration


# 99065
Inmate Violence During Incarceration
An examination of violent behavior in prisons and an assessment of predicting risk of violence by inmates while incarcerated.
9,638 words (approx. 38.6 pages) | 38 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


↶ Look Inside

Paper Summary:

This paper examines prison violence and describes existing methods for assessing risk for violent behavior. It analyzes factors contributing to or reducing institutional violence. It also looks at factors contributing to violent behavior in general and discusses major theories of aggression and violent behavior. The paper then analyzes current methods for predicting short and long term risk of violence in various settings, in order to develop a conceptual framework for predicting inmate violence while incarcerated.

Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Literature Review
Strategies for Assessing Future Risk of Violence
Actuarial Risk Assessment
Clinical Risk Assessment
Psychopathy and Violence
Method
Violence among Inmates
Assaults In Correctional Facilities
Mental Health Screening In Correctional Facilities
Violence Prevention Programs

From the Paper:

"A computer-based test interpretation (CBTI) system is a system that screens inmates for mental health issues in correctional facilities. This system was reviewed and tested to see if it is valid and useful. To begin this review, 100 adult male felons were administered a brief mental status interview and a series of psychological tests, including the MMPI, the revised Beta IQ Examination, and the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. Psychiatric diagnoses and CBTI ratings of victimization, violence, suicide, and substance abuse potentials were compared with clinicians' evaluations. Second, CBTI diagnosed 109 inmates and were compared with Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) diagnoses. Finally, CBTI risk ratings were compared with institutional infraction records of 1, 718 inmates. An agreement between CBTI and clinicians' risk ratings decided that this was in fact a fair diagnosis, and the diagnoses ranged from 60% to 93%. (Psychological Assessment, 1992, p. 138)"

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Anson, R. H., & Hancock, B. H. (1992). Crowding, proximity, inmate violence, and the eighth amendment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17(3), 123-132.
  • Brooks, C. A. (2004). Overcrowding and violence in federal correctional institutions: An empirical analysis. (Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(03B), 1594.
  • Camp, S. D., & Gaes, G. G. (2002). Growth and quality of U.S. private prisons: Evidence from a national survey. Criminology & Public Policy, 1(3), 427-449
  • Clip Art. (2007) Retrieved 18 May 2007 from: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/clipart/default.aspx.
  • Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1999). Evaluating the screening version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist (PCL SV): An item response theory analysis. Psychological Assessment, 11(1), 3-13.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Inmate Violence During Incarceration (2012, February 09). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-Inmate-Violence-During-Incarceration/99065

MLA Citation:

"Inmate Violence During Incarceration" 09 February 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Research-Paper-Inmate-Violence-During-Incarceration/99065>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 118.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Champ US
Publisher Since:
Sep 16, 2007
Writers for this organization have PhDs, Masters and Bachelors degrees. Nothing less is acceptable. All have exceptional writing skills that is reflected in their work.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success