Inclusion in Education

Paper Summary:

The purpose of this study is to determine what, if any conflicts of law are presented to educators and administrators of schools in compliance with the 'The Individual with Disabilities Education Act' and the 'No Child Left Behind Act', specifically that of inclusion. Further, this work researches inclusion in education and examines the pros and cons of inclusion as well as the laws that have been passed which affected inclusion. It also explores the types of methods used to teach in an inclusive classroom. Includes case studies and several tables and graphs.
Education: Inclusion
Abstract
Chapter One
Introduction
Background of the Study
Statement of the Problem
Purpose
Research Question
Assumptions
Delimitations
Definitions
Summary
I. Facts of Inclusion and the Laws Governing Classroom Practices
II. Case Study Findings
A. Case Study One
Case Study Two
Case Study Three
Case Study Four
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"The law with IDEA and the law in Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 are conflicting laws when viewed from the administration and educators view. Inclusion is a problem only where resources are restricted from fulfilling the funding aspect that is a vital requirement for successful inclusion. Without the resources available for successful implementation the consultative/collaborative environment that is one of the ingredients in the success of inclusion then there is no way for inclusion to be positive for all students thereby creating a level of discrimination in the classroom. Findings also show that there is a chance of discrimination in use of inclusion in the classroom."

More papers on Inclusion in Education:

• Analytical Essay # 69715 : "Inclusion in Education"
• Essay # 69704 : "Inclusion in Education"
• Article Review # 111239 : "Inclusion in Elementary Education"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: