Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

U.S. Military Tribunals


# 102447
U.S. Military Tribunals
This paper explores the justice of military tribunals in post-9/11 America.
1,612 words (approx. 6.4 pages) | 6 sources | MLA | 2008 United States


Paper Summary:

The paper argues that military tribunals are necessary and perfectly acceptable in post-9/11 America because there are constitutional and legislative precedents which allow for them. The paper asserts that as long as the President follows basic international laws vis-a-vis the treatment of prisoners who are detained and brought before American military tribunals, he is under no obligation to grant them the same constitutional rights and protections American citizens would enjoy in a civilian court-room.

From the Paper:

"Of course, critics of the existing military tribunals are legion - not least of all because the tribunals have in place laws that seem diametrically opposed to the procedural (even substantive) laws that have under-girded Anglo-American law for centuries. When the Bush Administration first set forth its guidelines for military tribunals near the end of 2001, the public outcry was considerable for the simple reason that the new measures seemed remarkably free of any rules at all. For instance, the Bush policy precluded any review of tribunal decisions by an independent court; as well, the rules of evidence were such that any material submitted for the tribunal's consideration was admissible just so long as it had "probative value to a reasonable person" (Knowland, para.8). Going further, convictions and sentencing required only a two-thirds vote and not unanimity."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Hongju Koh, Harold. "Against Military Tribunals." Dissent, 49.4 (2002): 58-62.
  • Jeffery, Terence P. "Military Tribunals: Constitutional, Legal, and Just." Human Events, 57.44 (2001, November 26): 3-4.
  • Knowland, Donald. "Pentagon Rules for Military Tribunals Violate Constitutional Rights." World Socialist Web Site. 2 Apr. 2002. International Committee of the Fourth International. 11 Mar. 2007 <http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/apr2002/trib-a02.shtml>
  • Krauthammer, Charles. "In Defense of Secret Tribunals," Time South Pacific 26 Nov. 2001: 100.
  • Ex Parte Quirin 317 U.S. 1 [1942].

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

U.S. Military Tribunals (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-U-S-Military-Tribunals/102447

MLA Citation:

"U.S. Military Tribunals" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-U-S-Military-Tribunals/102447>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 31.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Quality Writers US
Publisher Since:
Oct 23, 2007
We are a writing company that's been in business for over 7 years. We write top quality papers and have excellent feedback from all of our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success