Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

"The Inconvenient Truth"


# 112113
"The Inconvenient Truth"
An argument against the validity of the theories of Al Gore on global warming, as they are portrayed in his documentary, "The Inconvenient Truth."
4,203 words (approx. 16.8 pages) | 12 sources | MLA | 2009 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper discusses the reaction when Al Gore won an Academy Award for his documentary film, "An Inconvenient Truth," directed by Davis Guggenheim. The paper contends that Al Gore's theories on global warming have led people astray and that Gore has employed rhetoric and bad science and has even deliberately misled the public in his claims. The paper attempts to understand what could be the underlying impetus for Gore's presenting global warming as an impending doomsday event that is just around the corner.

Table of Contents:
The Inconvenient Truth of Rhetoric
The Science
The Kyoto Protocol
Summary and Conclusion

From the Paper:

"The argument is made by both sides that they are not popular, and that powerful organizations and people back the opposition, such that their coming forward - both sides - in support of their moral conscience on global warming has earned them no amount of respect from the other side. One scientist in The Great Global Warming Swindle, a professor in Ottawa, claims that taking a stand against Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, has brought death threats to his door. This scientist and others who appear in The Great Global Warming Swindle, again, do not disagree with Al Gore. They agree that the surface of the planet is warming. They do not agree that it is necessarily man-made emitted CO2 emissions that are producing the CO2 levels in the atmosphere, or that it is even CO2 as the cause of the warming. What they are suggesting is that if we embrace Gore's theories on global warming, then we will be ignoring the potentially real reason behind global warming. If anything can be done about global warming, it should at least be done in the direction of the real problem, the surface warming."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Aune, James Arnt. Rhetoric and Marxism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994. Questia. 29 Apr. 2008 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=96892619>.
  • Bhagwati, Jagdish. "Economic Policy in the Public Interest." Daedalus 136.4 (2007): 37+. Questia. 29 Apr. 2008 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5025070598>.
  • Douglas, Richard. Growthism and the Green Backlash, The Political Quarterly, 78/4, October-December, 2007, 547-555.
  • Durkin, Martin (dir). The Great Global Warming Swindle, film documentary, WAGtv, 2007.
  • Edinger, Raphael, and Sanjay Kaul. Sustainable Mobility: Renewable Energies for Powering Fuel Cell Vehicles. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003. Questia. 29 Apr. 2008 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=107034719>.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

"The Inconvenient Truth" (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-The-Inconvenient-Truth/112113

MLA Citation:

""The Inconvenient Truth"" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-The-Inconvenient-Truth/112113>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 67.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Write Fine US
Publisher Since:
Jan 27, 2009
We only hire experienced writers that have an academic background. We've been publishing our papers on AcaDemon for several years now and have a very high success rate.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success