Non-Heterosexual Marriage

Paper Summary:

This paper states that gay marriage must be allowed because of its necessity according to the dictates of natural liberty and civil justice. The author believes that, as long as marriage is a civil contract by which rights are allocated across the citizenry, rather than being a strictly social-religious ritual, then it must be available to all. The paper points our that the right of gay marriage has been likened to problems in the past with interracial marriage and female rights of inheritance, both cases that have been shown to be most unjust and immoral in their application to citizens.

From the Paper:

"He continues to explain that the only end for which mankind is warranted in interfering with the liberty of action of other humans is for immediate self-protection. Homosexual lifestyles and homosexual committed relationships are not a direct threat to anyone's physical well being. They are simply, at worst, an immoral or repulsive set of activities that must be tolerated in the name of liberty. (Personally, I find homosexuality to be neither repulsive nor immoral, but remember that we have ceded that point briefly to the opposition for sake of moving on to the point of civil liberties) Most importantly, those who practice these non-threatening behaviors must be afforded the same rights of self-determination as mainstream individuals."

More papers on Non-Heterosexual Marriage:

• Comparison Essay # 109371 : "The Legal Institution of Marriage"
• Essay # 38353 : "Family Structure"
• Analytical Essay # 141584 : "Psychology of Same-Sex Marriage Acceptance"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: