Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Jury Selection


Jury Selection
An analysis of jury selection strategies and rationale in the American courtroom today.
2,213 words (approx. 8.9 pages) | 10 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper contends that even jurors are just human and are prone to the same kinds of mistakes that all people make and that it is the responsibility of the courts and their officers to ensure that those who serve on juries possess the requisite qualifications to serve without prejudice. To determine what these qualifications are and how they are discerned during the jury selection process, this paper provides an overview of voir dire, case law and a discussion of how these play out in real-world settings today. A summary of the research and salient findings are provided in the conclusion.

Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Controlling Legislation
Common Jury Selection Strategies
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"Constitutional interpretations of the law vary according to the social context in which they are made, and this is clearly evident in the Supreme Court decisions over the years concerning jury selection. "Because of constitutional law's indeterminacy," Klarman (2004) advises, "social and political context matters greatly to constitutional interpretation, as the Court's decisions in the race area demonstrate" (pp. 448-9). According to this author, the Supreme Court addressed race discrimination in jury service for the first time in Strauder v. West Virginia (1880). In this case, the Court struck down a law that prohibited blacks from serving on juries; however, Klarman emphasizes that Strauder relied on the Fourteenth Amendment rather than the 1866 Civil Rights Act and focused on the civil rights of black defendants instead of the political rights of jurors who were excluded from service by virtue of their race."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • courtroom. American Criminal Law Review, 31(4), 1225-52.
  • Batson v. Kentucky, (1986). 476 U.S. 79.
  • Black's law dictionary. (1990). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
  • Garcia, A. (1992). The Sixth Amendment in modern American jurisprudence: A critical perspective. New York: Greenwood Press.
  • Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to civil rights: The Supreme Court and the struggle for racial equality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Jury Selection (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 12, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-Jury-Selection/94094

MLA Citation:

"Jury Selection" 15 January 2012. Web. 12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-Jury-Selection/94094>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 41.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

hicaliber US
Publisher Since:
Feb 28, 2007
We employ a large pool of writers that specialize in a variety of topics. In addition, they are all highly skilled researchers and editors. Our papers are of a very high quality and we have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success