Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

2008 Election


2008 Election
This paper discusses the 2008 election and looks at the electoral system in the United States.
2,723 words (approx. 10.9 pages) | 12 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


Paper Summary:

In this study, the writer proposes that a mixed-electoral system is the best electoral structure for the United States considering the high levels of inequality in the present system. Furthermore, the writer proposes that it should adopt a PR list tier next to a majoritarian nominal tier. Further, the writer suggests that the United States choose the "connection" model between nominal and list tiers. Lastly, the writer proposes that the United States should employ a closed-list for selecting candidates who run for elections.

Outline:
Introduction
Mixed Electoral Systems
The Proposed Electoral System for United States

From the Paper:

"For this study, we define mixed electoral systems as a division of the wider class of multiple-tier systems of voting. An electoral system utilizes multiple-tiers if seats have been assigned in two, or may be more, overlying sets of regions, in such a way that every voter is allowed to cast at least one vote (or more than one vote) that are utilized to assign seats in more than simply one tier. Models comprise the Belgian system of comparatively minute multi-seat regions, wherein votes are moved into upper tiers founded on districts to guarantee a strong estimation to PR. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Austria, and Greece are amid the PR structures that utilize two or three tiers of allotment, which typically create the system a lot more proportional than those systems where only one tier is used."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A., and Fiorina, M. P. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
  • Dulio, D.A. Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America. The Historian. 67. 4, 2005.
  • Dunleavy, P. and Margetts, H. Mixed Electoral Systems in Britain and the Jenkins Commission on Electoral Reform. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1: 12-38, 1999.
  • Farrell, D. Comparing Electoral Systems. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall, 1997.
  • Farrell, D. Electoral Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

2008 Election (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 12, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-2008-Election/97249

MLA Citation:

"2008 Election" 15 January 2012. Web. 12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Persuasive-Essay-2008-Election/97249>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 48.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

supercalifragilistic US
Publisher Since:
Jun 18, 2007
We have superior research and writing experts on our staff of writers and their skills are reflected in the papers they write. Writers on staff have achieved very high academic standings and all enjoy a professional status as writers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success