Abstract This paper describes the FederalBureau of Investigation agency of the United States. The author relates the FBI's background and humble beginnings and discusses the agency mission. The paper also addresses job application processes and describes the duties, hierarchy and different division within the agency. In addition, the paper discusses the portrayal of the FBI in movies and news reports and talks about the advantages and disadvantages of working for the agency.
From the Paper "There would be numerous travels also but a Special Agent specially will get to see the darkest side of humanity when the individual starts investigating notorious or heinous crimes. The FBI has set the standards for solving hundreds if not thousands of crimes other law enforcement agencies have given up on. Of course, being in the FBI means having to put your life on the line during the course ones career, every FBI personnel knows about this. The Bureau has instilled in its membership the glory and honor of making the ultimate sacrifice in fulfillment of Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity - these men and women will always be remembered as heroes of the United States defending the law and the nation."
Abstract This paper outlines many problems within the FBI such as withholding pertinent information that may have prevented the September 11 attacks. The author points out that these problems are not new. The paper discusses the new corrective program introduced by the FBI head, Robert Mueller, that needs to be enforced and accepted by the FBI culture.
From the Paper "Another problem that has haunted the FBI in recent months is the discovery that veteran agent Robert Hanssen was a Russian spy for twenty-five years. The FBI was scrutinized because they did not possess a serious attitude regarding internal security issues, and the lack of a cohesive management structure indicates that departments were not aware of each other's activities. In response to the Hanssen scandal, Congress approved the creation of a new position within the Justice Department to oversee the activities of the FBI."
Abstract The FederalBureau of Investigation (FBI) began with a force of special agents which was created by Attorney General Charles Bonaparte. Theodore Roosevelt and Bonaparte agreed that efficiency and expertise should determine the correct people to serve in government. This philosophy was known as progressivism. The paper shows that in 1908, Bonaparte applied the progressive metaphysics to the Department of Justice by creating a corps of special agents. It had neither a name nor an officially designated leader other than the Attorney General. Yet, these former detectives and Secret Service men were the founding fathers of the FBI. The paper explores the history of the FBI until modern times.
From the Paper "Freeh began his tenure with a clearly vocalized agenda that would respond both to growing and deeper crime problems and to a new era of government downsizing. In his oath of office speech he called for new levels of cooperation among law enforcement agencies, both at home and abroad, and he announced his intention to restructure the FBI in order to maximize its operational response to crime."
Abstract In this article, the writer notes that in recent years, in part due to the terrorist attacks of 9-11, there has been much talk of moving the FederalBureau of Investigation (FBI) from its current positioning within the Department of Justice to a new position within the Department of Homeland Security. The writer discusses that although the FBI and Department of Homeland Security can certain work well together in a number of ways, the current positioning of the FBI as a branch of the Department of Justice is the correct one. The writer argues that by examining the duties of both the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security and comparing and contrasting the results, one can see that moving this organization would be a mistake.
From the Paper "Fuel is added to the fire of this problem in two ways if the FBI is moved to the Department of Homeland Security. First, the FBI is now providing the check and balance system the Department of Homeland Security needs in order to be investigated when civil liberties are violated. With the FBI as a part of this organization, there is a potential for it to become a superpower within the government. The second way this adds to the problem is that the FBI would also come under this umbrella of abusing civil liberties."
A comparative analysis of the information systems security strategies of the FederalBureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Abstract This paper examines how, since the 9/11 incidents, information systems security has been a primary concern by all organizations as a result of the consequences that resulted in the loss of data and information in the ensuing attacks. It discusses the information systems security strategies of two federal agencies: the FederalBureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). It looks at how these two distinct agencies are opposites in term of their mandates; one is the premier law enforcement and security agency of the nation that already has a hard core security function as its mission while the other one sets the standards in various aspects of technology and business processes.
From the Paper "The FBI is the premier federal law enforcement and criminal investigative body of the United States. It is under the Department of Justice (DOJ) and has as its mission: "To protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats, to uphold and enforce the criminal laws of the United States, and to provide leadership and criminal justice services to federal, state, municipal, and international agencies and partners." Its current director, Robert S. Mueller III, literally went through a "baptism of fire" because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. He was recently sworn in a week before the attacks (September 4, 2001) thus not having the luxury of a "honeymoon period" in the agency. In fiscal year 2006, the total budget of the FBI was approximately $5.7 billion, including $495 million in program increases to enhance counterterrorism, counterintelligence, cyber crime, information technology, security, forensics, training, and criminal programs ."
Abstract This paper analyzes and examines the FBI's practices and compares it to Max Weber's theory of bureaucracy. Weber provided a theory regarding model bureaucracy that is utilized by many corporations and individuals today. The FBI is an organization that epitomizes Weber's theory of model bureaucracy. This paper discusses the shortcomings of the FBI and concludes with recommendations for improving the FBI's bureaucracy.
From the Paper "In comparing and contrasting the FBI's goals, objectives, and practices to Weber's model bureaucracy, numerous issues should be examined. First, do the FBI's real objectives differ from its stated goals and principles? Historically, the FBI's stated goals and principles are to ensure national security and serve the public. While the FBI ardently remains committed to pursuing and maintaining these objectives, often times, the FBI becomes so bogged down in bureaucracy that its real objectives become clouded and differ from its stated goals."
Abstract This paper discusses how, from 1978-1980, the FederalBureau of Investigations conducted a sting operation known as Abscam, which resulted in the criminal convictions of politicians in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, as well as a Senator and six members of the House. The paper contends that Abscam was one of the ugliest chapters in modern political history, destroying the careers and reputations of political figures at the local, state and federal levels. In particular, the paper looks at how one political figure who managed to emerge from the scandal relatively unscathed is John Murtha, who is now one of the longest-serving members of Congress. The paper also discusses how historians, political scientists, social commentators and criminologists have long debated whether Murtha should have been more aggressively pursued by the House and by the federal Justice Department.
Outline:
Murtha's Role in Abscam
House Ethics
Criminal Laws Broken?
Conclusion
From the Paper "From Murtha's perspective, he was exonerated. He has long declared his innocence, rightly pointing out that he never accepted a bribe during the meeting (Hannity and Colmes, 2006). Washington Post reporter Jack Anderson, who covered Abscam for the paper, offers a back-handed defense of Murtha, saying he played "perhaps the saddest scene on the secret Abscam videotapes. ... He refused to take the money, but his reason was hardly noble (Murtha: 'I expect,' 2006)." Indeed, one could argue that Murtha's reasons did not have to be noble. In the end, he did not take a bribe and arguably did not deserve to be as aggressively prosecuted as his colleagues, who accepted money."
This paper is an assessment of current and future employment and advancement opportunities with the FBI, including pay, benefits, education requirements, training and available locations.
Abstract This paper explains that, in the wake of the Home Security Act of 2002 and the FBI Reform Act of 2002, the FederalBureau of Investigation (FBI) is experiencing some shifts in human resource policies, which will affect current and future employees. The author points out that, while the FBI enjoys a certain "cloak-and-dagger" quality to its image, the reality is that the FBI requires employees for a wide range of job opportunities besides special agents. The jobs include professional support roles in any number of positions such as computer specialist, crime scene specialist, linguist and intelligence research specialist. The paper states that the FBI is headquartered in Washington, D.C.; the agency maintains field offices in a number of large cities throughout the United States, Puerto Rico and several major foreign cities.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Pay and Benefits
Employment and Advancement Opportunities
Employment Locations
Conclusion
From the Paper "Not surprisingly, pay scales are tied to the types of work involved, as well as other factors such as employment location (cost of living allowances are paid as with other federal positions) and seniority. In this regard, the FBI falls under the federal employment regimen, and employees receive GS ratings; special agents, for example, can attain a GS 15 rating and are eligible for "availability pay," which is equal to 25 percent of their annual base salary."
Abstract This paper discusses the various roles of the FederalBureau of Investigation (FBI). It specifically focuses on the FBI witness protection program. The paper discusses some previous cases and then looks at how the FBI decides who is given immunity and protection and whether these decisions are being made properly or even should be made at all.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Witness Protection
The Witness Protection Program
Analysis
From the Paper "Some people in the program itself have also raised complaints, stating that the government has not lived up to its agreement in some way or that the program itself is no longer needed in an era when the formerly powerful mob is no longer powerful: "Omerta, the mob law of silence, is long dead. With so many informants, targeting just one is pointless" (McShane, 2000, p. A1). The criminality of people like Sammy Gravano even while in the program has also been a point of contention, raising the question of how much the program is protecting questionable witnesses and not the public. The public questions the way the FBI and others decide whom to protect when people hear about cases like that of Boston mob hit man Joseph Barboza, who was aided by the FBI in 1971 to get him off of death row in California so he would not recant in a 1965 Massachusetts case that sent four innocent men to prison. He was aided when two FBI agents testified on his behalf. This has been deemed a cover-up that lasted more than thirty years. Two of the men wrongly sentenced died while in prison, while the other two were released after serving more than thirty years. The cover-p was discovered when the files of the two FBI agents who participated "revealed Barboza lied to the jury when he accused the four men of playing roles in the murder of the amateur boxer who offended Mob bosses" (Lawrence 2001, para. 13). Evidence has also been offered to show that Barboza killed several people while in the Witness Protection Program. Barboza himself was killed by a hitman in 1976."
Abstract The paper relates that the bombings of the World Trade Towers brought the conflict between the FBI and CIA to the surface. The paper looks at the two government agencies associated with gathering intelligence on activities that might threaten US lives and interests. The paper examines the conflict between the two agencies in terms of how it effects the current and future situation of the war on terrorism. The paper shows how the two agencies are set up for two entirely different purposes, but maintains that they must still be able to communicate and talk civilly together.
Outline:
Different Worlds: Cultural Effects
Defining New Roles: Gender Effects
Technological Barriers
Prospective and Trans-active goals
Lens Model of Conflict
From the Paper "The differences between the CIA and FBI stem from their original set up at their inception. They were initially set up for different functions, and only recently has the need to work closely stood in their way to perform their individual jobs. The key to the problem is communication between the two groups. One must delve into the origins of the two groups to understand these differences fully."
"The Central Intelligence Agency began in 1947 as a completely separate entity from the FBI. Interactions between the two groups have even been hostile at times (Gorman, 2007). Both groups share the goal of protecting the United States from hostile attacks, but they each had their own way of handling situations and developed a type of territorial attitude in order to avoid stepping on one another's efforts (Gorman, 2007). This attitude made it difficult for them to work as a team."
Abstract This paper examines how the FederalBureau of Investigations (FBI), with the criticisms of its Witness Protection Program, stands at a juncture in its history where the structure and organization of the entire setup requires a much-needed revamp to provide appropriate solutions to the problems dictated by the new trends in the world of crime and justice. It analyzes the functions and structure of the FederalBureau of Investigations Witness Protection Program, the important issues and problems pertaining to this program, and an interpretation of the current trends and the solutions that are envisaged by the public administration.
From the Paper "The Government has spend in billions on the witness Protection Program so far. The federal agencies including the U.S. Marshals coordinate in relocating the witnesses and if necessary, their associates and family members. (Federal Sentencing Reporter, 1998) The Attorney General ordered the Department of Justice, in the financial year of 2001, to create a list of the major money laundering and drug trafficking entities. The DEA and the Federal Bureau of Investigations and the U.S. Customs, part of the Department of Homeland Security) along with the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force and made a list of 53 most significant drug cartels that threaten the United States, called the Consolidated Priority Organization Target (CPOT) list, which is kept up to date to identify the suppliers to the United states and keep them in check."
Abstract On December 19, 2002, Robert S. Mueller, III, Director of the FederalBureau of Investigation, addressed the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City and remarked on the status of the War on Terror, as well as the status of the FBI. Mueller's remarks, carefully crafted to legitimise FBI operations, clearly embody the spirit of what rhetorician Hugh Rank refers to as cause rhetoric. This paper attempts to analyse the basic pattern of persuasion utilised in cause group rhetoric within Rank's predictable, four-part pattern of the "Pep Talk," including (1) the Threat; (2) the Bonding; (3) the Cause; (4) the Response. Each element is analysed both in the context of Muller's remarks and within the current political context.
From the Paper "Following the success of the USA PATRIOT ACT, the Bush administration soon announced plans for the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and on January 23, 2002, Congress enacted the "Homeland Security Act of 2002." To many it seemed the Bush administration and the 107th Congress had responded swiftly and appropriately to the realities of a post-September 11 America. However, upon closer scrutiny it has become overwhelmingly clear that individual Americans will pay the price for security, not only in higher taxes and reduced social welfare appropriations, but also through the calculated and unquestionable reduction of basic civil liberties."
A look at the 1940s fiasco of the Hollywood Ten, in which ten prominent figures in the film business were blacklisted for supposed anti-American views.
Abstract This paper examines how the late 1940s proved to be an interesting time in American history. It looks at how a new threat arose against the U.S. government as American communists began spying for the Soviet Union. In particular, it explores how J. Edgar Hoover and the FederalBureau of Investigation began to look into the mass media to find supposed Communist views, focusing on the film industry, and how, in 1947, the House Un-American Activities Committee under the leadership of a certain J. Parnell Thomas, held a hearing in which ten of Hollywood's premier film makers, actors, and producers were found to hold anti-American Communist views in their works. These Hollywood members became known as "The Hollywood Ten".
From the Paper "In order to single out supposed Communist members in Hollywood, the FBI devised certain set of criteria to determine if films contained anti-American views. Films were labeled subversive if ?Values or institutions judged to be particularly American are smeared or represented as evil in the movie, either explicitly or through casual references to current political events,? or if ?Values or institutions judged to be particularly anti-American or pro-Communist are glorified in the movie, either explicitly or through casual references to current political events (Noakes 5).? According to John Noakes, an assistant professor of sociology at Franklin and Marshall College, ?In four reports submitted between August 7 and November 17, 1947, the Los Angeles field office sent FBI headquarters reviews of seventeen movies released between 1943-1948 that it determined were subversive based on the MPAPAI criteria. "
Abstract This paper discusses the importance of institutional development in helping countries and governments to create and fortify precedent development objectives. It provides an example of the institutional development of the FederalBureau of Investigation and it discusses American Democracy in terms of institutional development. The paper finally discusses the institution of marriage and the debate over gay marriage and how these topics fits in with this concept of institutional development.
From the Paper "In my opinion, democracy is in danger when registered voters go to the polls and experience a waiting game or new voting machines have glitches, which makes voting frustrating. Democracy is in danger when the votes are counted and there are inaccuracies among the counts for the electors. Democracy is in danger when enthusiasts gerrymandering make certain that elections are over before the registered voters vote. Democracy is in danger when government procedures intimidate basic civil independence. Democracy is in danger when special interest groups distribute money or other monetary gifts for election campaigns."
Abstract This paper explains CODIS, which is the 'Combined DNA Index System'. The paper provides the historical information relating to CODIS and discusses why the database was established by the FederalBureau of Investigation. It also explains its use, applications and limitations. The paper then examines the predicted and probable future uses of CODIS.
Table of Contents:
Objective
Introduction
Overview of CODIS
Uses of CODIS
CODIS Applications
CODIS Limitations
Future of CODIS
From the Paper "Stated as a limitation of the use of CODIS is that in mass fatality incidents it is reported that each human remain is likely to match several samples. It is not to say a person would go unidentified but instead the limitation would be that individuals would be identified multiple times. Another limitation that exist with the CODIS system is that contamination or degradation of a sample may inhibit the ability to make a genetic profile. (Cheng, Garofalo, Keung, Li, Nguyen, and Wharton, 2006) Instructions provided for avoidance of contamination of degradation of samples are inclusive of the following: (1) "Wear gloves. Change them often; (2) Use disposable instruments or clean them thoroughly before and after handling each sample; (3) Avoid touching the area where you believe DNA may exist; (4) avoid talking, sneezing, and coughing over evidence; (5) Avoid touching your face, nose, and mouth when collecting and packaging evidence; (6) Air-dry evidence thoroughly before packaging; and (7) Put evidence into new paper bags or envelopes, not into plastic bags. Do not use staples." (National Institute of Justice, 2007)"
