Visual Perception

Paper Summary:

This paper examines how the concept of visual perception is complex in nature and how a number of different interpretations of the concept have been established throughout the field of psychology. Although the eyes view objects in a series of short, erratic movements, the brain processes these actions efficiently, so that actual visual experiences are smooth and steady. It looks at how, in order to evaluate perception effectively, two distinct schools of thought must be evaluated: modular and interactive; this paper assesses the circumstances surrounding these two experiences and the factors leading up to a conclusion of the most appropriate solution to the perception dilemma.

Outline
Introduction
Review of Related Literature
Movement and Action in the World
Visual Recognition in Relation to Object Processing
Cognitive Psychology and Visual Perception
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"Research conducted by Humphreys, Price, and Riddoch in 1999 in the article entitled "From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach" indicates that the recognition of objects is largely based on a series of processing actions and that object naming is based on a combination of visual processing and recognition tasks. The research designates that "objects from categories with similar members produce a spread of activation across the structural descriptions of perceptual neighbors, and this slows the time for object decision" (Humphreys, Price, & Riddoch, 1999, p. 120). A number of neuroscientific studies are discussed in this essay, and the primary conclusion that the authors portray is that retrieving an object's name is dependent upon visual differentiation between categories, and may involve visual processing in earlier stages."

More papers on Visual Perception:

• Essay # 47273 : "How Visual Perception Occurs"
• Essay # 65345 : "Visual Perception in Children"
• Essay # 47425 : "Visual Perception"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: