A critical analysis of two philosophy text books: "Introduction to Logic, Tenth Edition" by Copi and Cohen, and "Against Method: Third Edition" by Feyerabend.
Written in 2006; 3,126 words; 2 sources; MLA; $ 91.95
Paper Summary:
The paper defines the two different methods in these two text books and brings examples of how they can be applied in the modern world. The paper summarizes the main differences between the logic approach and the against approach. In conclusion, the writer is drawn to the ideas in "Against Method" as a result of the indefiniteness of life, and feels that "Introduction to Logic" is just another reading assignment, while acknowledging that logic does need to be understood and learned.
From the Paper:
"Most philosophers live on the remnants of the past. There is hardly any philosopher today who will not, obliquely, refer to Plato or Aristotle, Augustine, or Nietzsche. We are concerned with mental analyses in most of philosophy, perhaps challenged by someone's world view someone else does not agree with, as with Hans Kung against today's Vatican. And now, Copi/Cohen bring us to spatial representation. We live in a time where everything is visual. As children we learn to count and to alphabetize on Sesame Street on television. Sega may give us better hand/eye coordination. Our attention-span is often dictated by half-hour or hour television programming, which makes producers of lengthy films now build in an intermission, for a pit stop for our brains (and a financially profitable stop at the refreshment counter). "Feyerabend's theories of the "inexpert" might have someone look at the typical flat movie screen and say, "Hey, wouldn't it be more effective if there were a 180-degree curved screen?" Perhaps Copi/Cohen would not be interested in Cinerama or other new surround-screen productions. Or, they might turn it into a very "logical" example: A rounded screen gives a better image. Cinerama uses a rounded screen for its projection. Therefore, Cinerama gives a better image. So, cut and dried. So, "logical". The difference between these two books is, to use a simplistic example, someone just learning to drive, who gets all the diagrams and blueprints of how a car works and why; and that driver finding out, from father or driving instructor that there is fun to be had with good driving. Not everyone is interested in the logic of why anti-lock brakes are better, or five-speed gives you better traction and acceleration. Driving can be fun. It can get you from point A to point B faster than walking. Why do we need to "learn" the diagrammatic structure of logic? Perhaps, as Sir Edmund Hilary explained when he was asked why he climbed Mt. Everest, 'because it is there'."
We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.
This Free Term Paper Abstract is a part of our Term Paper Library.Here you can purchase research papers, examples of essays, academic dissertations, articles, notes, analytical papers, book reports, stories and poems. We have thousands of persuasive, point-of-view, narrative, critical, compare and contrast and other types of essays in our Library. You can also find here Term papers on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Essays on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Research papers on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Student papers on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Book reports on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Dissertation on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Thesis on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Summary of paper on "Two Approaches to Philosophy", Articles written on "Two Approaches to Philosophy".
Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on