Bookmark and Share This is AcaDemon.com

Home Sellers Area Buy Term paper FAQs Custom Term Papers Contact Us AcaDemon.com AcaDemon UK AcaDemon Australia AcaDemon Canada AcaDemon France AcaDemon Germany AcaDemon Spain
Tags
adventist, animals, argument, case, classics, day, eating, ethical, ethics, issue, lens, opposing, philosophy, seventh, utilitarian, utilitarianism, vegan, vegetarianism, wrong
Currency
Advanced
Essay (General) # 52924 :: There's Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?
Analysis of an ethical issue through a particular lens, in this case, utilitarian vegetarianism and the opposing argument on vegetarianism.
Written in 2004; 2,011 words; 5 sources; MLA; $ 63.95
Paper Summary:
This paper presents six opinions on vegetarianism, one of which is the author's. The other opinions belong to Porphyry, a classical author in favor of vegetarianism; Regan, a utilitarian for vegetarianism; Singer, another utilitarian for vegetarianism (Regan and Singer's articles are written in response and reply format); Jarvis, a former vegetarian now opposed to the lifestyle, but a "vegetable enthusiast";and Fitzroy, an avid, if not radical, opponent of vegetarianism. Using these sources, the author makes a case for supporting vegetarianism and perceiving vegetarianism as the correct choice for Utilitarians.
From the Paper:
"Vegetarianism may seem like somewhat of a fad diet in America but it is actually quiet an ancient practice. It is the norm amongst some eastern religions, and many great minds have lauded it's benefits, despite being in the minority opinion, for centuries. Eight of the most influential classical philosophers and scholars were vegetarians including Pythagoras, Empedocles, Theophrastus, Seneca, Ovid, Plutarch, Plotinus, and Porphyry. Porphyry, perhaps the least familiar, offers a very interesting defense of his beliefs. His argument has two parts. In the first place he says that although plants are alive they are not sensitive. Plants do not feel pain nor have any fear of being hurt whereas animals do. Sensation is thus the principal which joins us to animals and makes harming them wrong. Porphyry anticipates that critics would say there is something more which in fact separates humans from animals, rational thought. However, Porphyry points out that not all people are capable of rational thought, or sentiency, therefore if that is the criterion for treating people with justice it opens up the argument for injustice against those who do not meet the criteria such as infants and the mentally retarded. Infants, the retarded, and all humans are capable of sensation and all fear pain just as other animals do. Therefore in order to include all humans it would be necessary to lower the standard against harm from sentiency to sensitivity in which case other animals would fit the criteria. Porphyry assumes his reader thinks it is wrong to harm humans. By saying that the universal human condition is sensation, not sentiency, he implicitly makes the statement that it is wrong to cause suffering to those with sensation. Thus it is wrong to hurt animals therefore eating meat is wrong. (Porphyry, 143) Although I have been a vegetarian for 3 years this is the most compelling argument for my beliefs that I have ever read, and one I never thought of. Most vegetarians can give you a passionate response as to why they abstain from eating meat but not all of these arguments are rational. Consequently not all arguments against vegetarianism are either. Singer and Reagan make some important points along the line of Porphyry's argument and concerning utilitarianism and Jarvis and Fitzroy have equally interesting objections."

More papers on "There's Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?"

About AcaDemon

We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.

*Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?

If you can't find your topic here, try another search

or try our affordable, unique custom paper alternative

Custom Research Services include:

  • Papers written from scratch, according to your specifications.
    Every paper is UNIQUE - Guaranteed
  • Professional, top-notch writers
  • All topics covered
  • Any deadline
  • Your satisfaction guaranteed

Place a Custom Research order now

Find out more about Custom Research



This Free Term Paper Abstract is a part of our Term Paper Library.Here you can purchase research papers, examples of essays, academic dissertations, articles, notes, analytical papers, book reports, stories and poems. We have thousands of persuasive, point-of-view, narrative, critical, compare and contrast and other types of essays in our Library. You can also find here Term papers on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Essays on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Research papers on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Student papers on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Book reports on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Dissertation on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Thesis on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Summary of paper on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?", Articles written on "There?s Something Wrong with Not Eating Animals?".

Shopping Cart
 Total :
$ 0.00
Special Offer
Buy one paper and get
40% off the 2nd paper*
 
*The least expensive paper