The Glass Ceiling

Paper Summary:

This paper explains that major signs of the existence of glass ceilings are that (1) virtually all women have lower mean incomes when compared to their male counterparts and (2) most minority men earn less than non-Hispanic, white men with the same education at the same occupational level. The author points out that specific company actions to avoid being the target of a potential lawsuit are using the neutral systems of merit or seniority based pay and focusing their strategic business plans on achieving workforce diversity. The paper stresses that, to break down the glass ceiling, employers should realize that they need the input of women and minorities in their businesses to better address the changing consumer markets, workplace demographics and competition in today's economy.

Table of Contents
Introduction
Background
Pertinent Employment Laws
Recommendations
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"Further, Redwood lists internal structural barriers and business barriers such as: Outreach and recruitment practices that do not reach or recruit women and minorities; corporate climates that alienate and isolate; pipeline barriers that restrict career growth because of poor training, inadequate mentoring, biased rating and testing systems; few or no internal communication networks; limited rotational job assignments that lead to the executive suite and institutional rigidity that deny the fragile family and work balance. Often, qualified people are denied from reaching their full potential because they do not have access to mentoring, developmental assignments, training, and other career enhancing activities."

More papers on The Glass Ceiling:

• Research Paper # 93925 : "Women and the Glass Ceiling"
• Essay # 72400 : "Shattering the Glass Ceiling"
• Term Paper # 125394 : "The Glass Ceiling"
• Essay # 88278 : "Women and the Glass Ceiling"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: