Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Spinal vs. General Anesthesia


# 53935
Spinal vs. General Anesthesia
This paper discusses the effects of spinal vs. general anesthesia on the projected outcome for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
1,455 words (approx. 5.8 pages) | 5 sources | APA | 2004 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper explains that the majority of research indicates that anesthetic choice has little impact on the outcome of surgery for patients undergoing TURP and related procedures. The author points out that physicians should instead take into consideration the likelihood for increased overall morbidity and mortality rates in patients due to the nature of the surgery and increased likelihood that patients are coming into a procedure with increased complications prior to surgery. The paper states that general and spinal anesthesia both carry risks, and both carry adverse side effects; which side effects a patient is best equipped to handle should be the determining factor for the majority of patients undergoing TURP.

Table of Contents
Introduction
Literature Review
Implications to Practice

From the Paper:

"There is research indicating that adverse effects may result from anesthetic choice during prostatectomy, or at least evidence indicating that in general this procedure is more risky and likely to result in a greater likelihood for poor outcome. The Department of Urology at Freeman Hospital in Newcastle, UK conducted a study that examined complications and morbidity resulting from prostatectomy in 1400 men. The patients were examined for a period of 8 months, with patients undergoing TURP examined from 12 separate institutions. Data was collected related to "factors potentially affecting mortality and morbidity" which included the American Society of Anesthesiologists co-
morbidity scores. Complications post-surgery included 8% of patients developing sepsis, with a large percentage of patients having a "significantly increased rate of deaths and complications" and emergent situations requiring re-admission to the hospital . The study concluded that due to the increased likelihood of complications, which were seen across population groups of varying ages, it is essential that care providers further examine potential increased causes for morbidity rates after prostatectomy. The increased likelihood of complications was not directly tied to anesthetic technique, but this possibility was also not ruled out."

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Spinal vs. General Anesthesia (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Essay-Spinal-vs-General-Anesthesia/53935

MLA Citation:

"Spinal vs. General Anesthesia" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Essay-Spinal-vs-General-Anesthesia/53935>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 28.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Calwriter US
Publisher Since:
Nov 28, 2004
We've been publishing our papers on AcaDemon for several years now and have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers. Our writers invest a great deal of time and effort in researching and writing all of their papers and their professionalism as writers is reflected in those papers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success