This paper examines how, in Plato's "Dialogues", Socrates and Meno come to the truth of how virtue is acquired and what virtue actually is. It examines how the path to this truth is painful for the two and how they finish the dialogue perplexed on the question.
From the Paper:
"Meno challenges Socrates with a paradox of knowledge until Socrates refutes it. Socrates tells Meno that he has failed to define virtue in the appropriate manner. "I begged you just how not to break up or fragment virtue, and I have examples of how you should answer. You paid no attention, but you tell me that virtue is to be able to secure good things with justice, and this, you say, is a part of virtue." Socrates required the nature of virtue in his definition and Meno has failed to identify this. Meno is frustrated by this and accuses Socrates of being a bewitching and beguiling character, and Socrates explains to Meno that he is nothing of the sort."