Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Schechtman's Criticism of Parfit


# 55437
Schechtman's Criticism of Parfit
A paper that comprehensively describes Parfit's theory of personal identity and Schechtman's criticisms of that theory.
2,114 words (approx. 8.5 pages) | 4 sources | MLA | 2004 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper summarizes the ideas of Derek Parfit in the field of personal identity and then expresses the criticisms of Derek Parfit by Marta Schechtam that she includes in her well-known book, "The Constitution of Selves".

From the Paper:

"Parfit describes the reductionist view of the personal identity theory as, "the truth about people must consist in the truth of facts about bodies, and about various interrelated mental and physical events such as thoughts, memory, experiences" (Chalmers, 658) Thus, according to a reductionist, persons are nothing over and above the existence of certain mental and/or physical states and their various relations. Parfit illustrates his reductionist view of persons with the famous "club" example: Just as we are not apt to think that a social club has any ontological status over and above the existence of its members and their relation to one another, so too Parfit claims that we should not take persons to exist apart from the various physical and psychological events that characterize them. (Schechtman, 37) Given this, Parfit believes that facts about personal identity just consist in more particular facts concerning psychological continuity and/or connectedness, and thus personal identity can be reduced to this continuity and/or connectedness. As noted earlier, for Parfit, what it means to be a reductionist about persons is to hold that persons are constructs of appropriately related person time-stages. All that is required for a person at time t2 to be the same person as a person at t1 on a reductionist psychological continuity theory, then, is for person at t2 to be psychologically continuous with the person at time t1. This is what Parfit terms the Psychological Criterion for personal identity."

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Schechtman's Criticism of Parfit (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Essay-Schechtman's-Criticism-of-Parfit/55437

MLA Citation:

"Schechtman's Criticism of Parfit" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Essay-Schechtman's-Criticism-of-Parfit/55437>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 39.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Becks US
Publisher Since:
Dec 05, 2004
Hi, I am a neuroscience and math double major. Besides, I have a minor in philosophy and statistics. I write a lot of papers in neuroscience and philosophy. There hasn't been a paper that I got lower than A/A-. Check them out!
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success