This paper explores the sociological underpinnings of the issue regarding the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Written in 2004; 3,186 words; 11 sources; MLA; $ 92.95
Paper Summary:
Using the Durkheimian paradigm, the author explains this debate in terms of its symbolic meaning to the parties involved, opponents, and proponents of same-sex marriage. Further, this paper postulates that the debate regarding this issue is a symbolic debate between two competing world views and elaborates on these world views, describing the sociological context of each side of the debate, providing compelling examples and evidence to suggest that socioeconomic factors, educational background, and geographical location are reliable predictors of individual opinion with regard to the issue of same-sex marriage. Main paper points address the legal debate concerning the limitation of governmental involvement, which, however, is merely a legal rationalization for two competing ideologies struggling to become the predominant collective consciousness in American culture and politics. The world views of both parties are largely affected by external social facts, such as economics, race, education, location, and religion. Key words include Durkheim, collective consciousness, world view, mechanical solidarity, organic solidarity, and functionalism.
From the Paper:
"The question of whether or not to permit the recognition of same-sex unions has faced over half of the state legislatures in the United States in the past 5 years. Perhaps the most highly publicized case involves three gay couples who filed suit against the state of Hawaii as a result of the state's refusal to issue marriage licenses to the couples. The couples alleged that the state's prohibition of gay marriage was a result of gender discrimination and thus violated the state's Equal Rights Amendment. A trial court ruled against the group, but in a 1993 appeal, the state's Supreme Court overturned the earlier court's ruling and ordered the state to distribute marriage licenses to gay couples, but delayed the order pending appeal. In 1999, the state's Supreme Court rendered the campaign for gay marriage in Hawaii moot by citing a 1998 amendment to the Hawaii Constitution, which stated that the lawmakers of Hawaii have the authority to limit the recognition of marriage to opposite-sex partners."
We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.
This Free Term Paper Abstract is a part of our Term Paper Library.Here you can purchase research papers, examples of essays, academic dissertations, articles, notes, analytical papers, book reports, stories and poems. We have thousands of persuasive, point-of-view, narrative, critical, compare and contrast and other types of essays in our Library. You can also find here Term papers on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Essays on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Research papers on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Student papers on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Book reports on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Dissertation on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Thesis on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Summary of paper on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.", Articles written on "Same-Sex Marriage in the U.S.".
Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on