Federal Funding

Paper Summary:

This paper notes that at the local level the most restrictive elements come with regulations and mandates, while grants and intergovernmental transfers carry fewer restrictions, though some do have restrictions. In truth, though, the answer may depend on what specific program or type of program is being considered. The paper further discusses how unfunded mandates can be the most problematic forcing local governments to take action without giving them the wherewithal to achieve the task set for them.

From the Paper:

"For the most part, at the local level, the most restrictive elements come with regulations and mandates, while grants and intergovernmental transfers carry fewer restrictions, though some do have restrictions. In truth, though, the answer may depend on what specific program or type of program is being considered. Unfunded mandates can be the most problematic, forcing local governments to take action without giving them the wherewithal to achieve the task set for them. In the current climate, many cities are experiencing problems because of security concerns, with tasks set for them by the federal government with no provision for how to pay for the added police and fire services required. States and local governments are noting more and more that there is a budget crunch and that one reason for this is unfunded mandates from Washington. "

More papers on Federal Funding:

• Term Paper # 128921 : "Education Funding"
• Comparison Essay # 142493 : "Two State Funding Model Comparisons"
• Analytical Essay # 25829 : "Federal Funds and Abortions"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: