Clinton V. State of New York

Paper Summary:

.Involved Levels of the Judiciary
The Constitutionality of the Line Item veto was decided on a federal level. U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said the law, centering on its violation of Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution, violates the Constitution's requirement that the president sign or veto bills in their entirety. Judge Hogan said that the line item veto bill also gave the President part of Congress' lawmaking role (Biskupic and Barr, 1998).
Judge Hogan pointed out two sets of challengers with
standing. In New York City, two hospital associations and other
related groups objected to Clinton's cancellation of a budget provision. This brought objections at the state and federal level. At the trial and appellate level The other case, Idaho potato..."

From the Paper:

"Discussion of Clinton v. State of New York
1.Involved Levels of the Judiciary
The Constitutionality of the Line Item veto was decided on a federal level. U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan said the law, centering on its violation of Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution, violates the Constitution's requirement that the president sign or veto bills in their entirety. Judge Hogan said that the line item veto bill also gave the President part of Congress' lawmaking role (Biskupic and Barr, 1998).
Judge Hogan pointed out two sets of challengers with
standing. In New York City, two hospital associations and other
related groups objected to Clinton's cancellation of a budget provision. This brought objections at the state and federal level. At the trial and appellate level The other case, Idaho potato..."

More papers on Clinton V. State of New York:

• Analytical Essay # 131247 : "The State of New York v. Olive Oyl"
• Comparison Essay # 101176 : "The State of New York v. Olive Oyl"
• Case Study # 95771 : "Pennell v. State of Delaware"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: