Paper Summary:

The paper uses Millard Erickson's book "Christian Theology" to compare and contrast the belief structures of the Calvinists, Arminians and Karl Barth. This includes a brief summary of Erickson's perspective on how the conflicts between these theologies can be resolved. The topics discussed in this paper include predestination, the elect, human depravity and free will as pertains to these concepts.

From the Paper:

"The Calvinists and Arminians have some very basic conflicting views of the predestination of humans in relation to God, grace and free will. Theologian Karl Barth devised a series of arguments that attempted to walk a path between or perhaps around these conflicting arguments, while still not completely disagreeing with either position out of hand. In this paper, I will discuss the similarities and differences between these three perspectives and describe Millard Erickson's solution to the apparent discrepancies. The Calvinist beliefs on predestination are complex, and are best described, according to Erickson, as falling into one of five basic tenets. These are: "total depravity, unconditional predestination, limited atonement, irresistible grace and perseverance." Each of these concepts is important to understanding their basic belief system, although there are variations in the theology."

Visitors who viewed this Essay also liked these:

• Analytical Essay # 32266 : "St. Thomas Aquinas' Contribution to Christian Theology"
• Descriptive Essay # 139932 : "Christian Theology from a Seventh-day Adventist Perspective"
• Essay # 71417 : "Greek Philosophers and Christian Theology"
• Comparison Essay # 105873 : "Philosophy and Christian Theology"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: