A discussion of the current problems with Microsoft and the anti-trust that they have violated as well as possible solutions to Microsoft's monopolization.
This paper reviews the Microsoft antitrust case and outlines the prohibitions placed on them by the Federal Courts. It looks at how Microsoft cannot retaliate against any original equipment manufacturers (OEM) or any Independent Hardware Providers (IHP) by altering Microsoft's commercial relations with them and how OEMs can offer software that competes with Microsoft Platform Software and Microsoft Middleware. It evaluates how Microsoft is no longer allowed to write code that automatically boots Microsoft operating systems and Microsoft middleware so that users have the option of launching other Operating Systems from the start.
From the Paper:
"There is a huge difference in what is sufficient information and what is thorough information. If one wanted to get a quick and brief understanding of an issue like the Microsoft antitrust case the mainstream media can provide just that. Media sources touch on the highlights as they unfold. They cannot accurately predict what is going to happen thus their journalism is reactionary. This quality of media is enemy to anyone trying to get a working foundation of information. When a story is followed from the beginning, and every article is read the reader can get a functional understanding of what is going on because each story build upon the last."