ASEAN vs Traditional Diplomacy

Paper Summary:

The writer looks briefly at the history of the ASEAN and discusses the Association's objectives. In this article, ASEAN conflict resolution methods are compared to those of traditional diplomatic methods. The writer considers why ASEAN diplomacy is better for the dispute between China and Philippines over the Spratly Islands.

From the Paper:

"The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established in Bangkok by the five original Member Countries, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. It has since been joined by Brunei, Darussalam, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar and Cambodia. The objectives of ASEAN are to accelerate economic growth, social progress and cultural development in the region, through joint endeavors and to do so in the spirit of partnership, to strengthen the foundation for a prosperous and peaceful community of Southeast Asian nations. It promotes regional peace and stability through ... "

More papers on ASEAN vs Traditional Diplomacy:

• Comparison Essay # 115931 : "The Big-Stick vs. Dollar Diplomacy"
• Research Proposal # 109962 : "Alternative vs. Traditional Teaching Methods"
• Comparison Essay # 53164 : "Natural Remedies vs. Traditional Medicine"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: