Abstract This paper mainly discusses the idea of Holocaust denial and the people who follow this practice and how they support their ideas with the views of Deborah Lipstadt and her rebuttal.
From the paper:
""Modern Holocaust denial draws inspiration from a variety of sources" (Lipstadt 31). The Holocaust Deniers, or more appropriately called "revisionist" historians, and historians of the traditional school seem to differ greatly in their methodologies as shown when they use the same piece of evidence in two separate manners to come to two completely different conclusions."
Tags: deniers, holocaust, ii, lipstadt, revisionists, war, world
Abstract This paper takes a look at the ideas of sociolinguist Deborah Tannen, regarding conversational rituals. The paper reports how, according to Tannen, communication is never simply about saying what you mean, or merely communicating information in a factual manner. Every conversation has a complex undercurrent, or subtext.
Outline:
Ritual Opposition Talk
Rapport Talk
Trouble Talk
Public Talk
Private Talk
Directness & Indirectness Talk
From the Paper "Trouble talk, or confessional talk, the exchanging of information about problems, is another form of intimacy, also often seen amongst women in our current cultural environment. A woman might share her problems about a new boss or boyfriend. When trouble talking, women often expect empathetic agreement from their partner, while men might often be taken aback when a more stereotypically male approach to 'solving' the problem that is apparently troubling the woman meets with opposition. Often, the purpose of trouble talk is opening up about an emotional need, not 'fixing' a specific problem in the eyes of many women."
Abstract The paper discusses how Deborah Sampson Gannet impersonated a man for the purpose of serving in the colonial army and liberating her country from the British. The paper describes Sampson's wartime bravery and subsequent peacetime role of partial breadwinner for her impoverished household. The paper asserts that her story is important to retell today, in honor of her gender and her service to her country.
From the Paper "Deborah Sampson Gannett is the first American woman known to have impersonated a man for the purpose of serving in the colonial army during the American Revolutionary War. The contributions of female figures such as Deborah Sampson Gannett have often remained ignored or unrecognized in contemporary accounts of colonial history, despite their major contributions to the early struggle for freedom, equality, and justice (Henrietta, 1997). Sampson did not lead soldiers to victory in a major battle like Joan of Arc. But feminists claim Sampson's life as important and worthy of study for what her example reveals about the age in which she lived, and because of her fearless determination."
Tags: colonial, army, war, soldier, breadwinner, gender
An analysis of male and female conversational styles based on Deborah Tannen's "You Just Don't Understand," which discusses how men and women act substantially differently in a number of ways - including conversational style.
800 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 0 sources, 2001, $ 28.95
Abstract This paper analyzes the book "You Just Don't Understand by the linguist Deborah Tannen. The sees it as a work of popular psychology written with the intention of analyzing and explaining the different conversational and linguistic styles of men and women. The author cites Tannen's central thesis that some of the difficulties in communication between men and women in the workplace and at home are the result of the inherently different conversational styles of the sexes.
From the Paper "Some of Tannen's theories tend to support common preconceived notions of gender norms. For instance, women are thought to emphasize collaboration and consensus when coming to a group decision. Men tend to use confrontation, even when they are in some form of basic agreement with the individual with whom they are speaking. This male, confrontational style, even when done in a friendly manner, can be alienating to women. Women, in contrast, often use conversation not as a means of communicating information but as a way of reaffirming interpersonal connections. This is why men often think that women are talking about nothing. The purpose of such traditionally female speech is not the topic of conversation that is at hand, rather it is to say, "Yes we're friends", or Yes we're together", or simply "I am here for you." This is why women are often taken aback when, in trying to talk about their day, the man in their life tries to solve the problem their words have brought up, rather than simply listening to them and acknowledging and affirming "Yes, you did have a problem at work today."
Tags: gender, male, female, sexual identity, sex role stereotype
A review on Deborah Tannen's article on "How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently" which argues that males and females have different styles of communication.
Abstract The following brief review examines Deborah Tannen's article on "How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently" and asserts that the style of classroom communication supports how males learn rather then how females learn. This review argues that Tannen's argument itself is biased towards wanting to show an unfair situation for females.
From the Paper "Tannen makes some excellent points in this article. Considering the current focus on equal opportunity, the point that one situation for everyone is not necessarily the best way is an important one.
Tannen effectively describes some of the ways that males and females are different, showing how the classroom is tailored to the needs of males. In this description, though, there appears to be a bias. For example, debate and participation are only two aspects of the classroom. Other aspects include written tests, reading assignments and presentations to class. These aspects that may be more suitable to female learning are not discussed."
Abstract This paper analyzes Deborah Tannen's theory that men and women communicate differently based on the different ways men and women perceive things, from her book "You Just Don't Understand". For men, communication is a way of maintaining status, developing a hierarchy and giving orders. In contrast, women communicate for interpersonal connections, to achieve a sense of community and to maintain equal status. This paper evaluates the possibility that such a complex subject like communication can be separated into two distinct categories so easily and whether this approach shows a stereotype that can be applied to all people.
From the Paper "There may be an overall trend towards women preferring to communicate for a certain reason, but this does not mean that every woman is the same. Accepting this view and believing that men and women can be understood so easily is a major error in judgment. It is also worth noting that in most communications it is not one person communicating with the other gender as a whole. It is one person communicating with one individual. For this communication to be most effective, the people need to make an effort to understand the perspective of each other. Attaching generalized meanings to the communication does not help with this. Another area overlooked is other characteristics that impact on a person's perspective."
This paper review Deborah Prothrow-Stith and Michaele Weissman's "Deadly Consequences" which discusses the ways that violence is destroying our teenage population and presents a plan to begin resolving the problem.
1,545 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 1 source, 2002, $ 50.95
Abstract This paper explains that Deborah Prothrow-Stith and Michaele Weissman's in "Deadly Consequences" find that most teenage violence derives from feelings of anger and aggression, which can end in violent death. The paper emphasizes the role of guns, gangs and adolescence itself. The author underscores the books proposal that a public health model similar to the one used to stop smoking be used to better control teenage violence.
From the Paper "Adolescence is itself a difficult period in the life of a person, and it is filled with many threats and dangers which are only exacerbated in a violent society or social setting. The authors believe that there were numerous releases operating in the past that reduced the amount of anger felt by young people, and, of course, society itself was not so stressful or violent. The authors refer to one young man who found release in sports, though the authors ignore the more general effect sports in America may have on increasing aggression and so increasing violence. The authors note that the dangers in society are even greater for young black males, who consequently are a near-endangered species. The growth in the drug trade has to be cited as a major reason for much of the violence, both because the use of drugs reduces certain inhibitions and increases the possibility of violence and because those in the drug trade are ruthless in pursuing their business."
Abstract The paper discusses the author Frances Manuel's tribal origins, and the way that anthropologist Deborah Neff wrote the book from Manuel's spoken words, and so sometimes these words appear as poetry, trying to capture the way Manuel actually spoke them. The oral history portrays the conflicts experienced by Manuel as she tried to reconcile her native Indian world with contemporary American life in Tucson, Arizona.
From the Paper "It is quite obvious that the book owes much of its clarity and detail to the relationship that grew between Deborah Neff and Frances Manuel. Neff notes they were more alike than different (Manuel and Neff xxxviii), and it is quite clear Manuel not only trusted Neff with the story of her life, but she felt comfortable with her, comfortable enough to relate her stories into an ever present tape recorder. The two women were friends before they began working on this project and that of course would account for the camaraderie that is clearly present throughout the book. These two women enjoyed each other's company, and respected each other, which gave them the freedom and ability to share their stories, and collaborate to share them with the world."
Abstract This paper applies the theories of Freud, Skinner, Maslow, Kelly and Horney to the experiences of Deborah in "I Never Promised You a Rose Garden".
An analysis of three award nominated children's books, "Nobody in Particular", by Molly Bang, Eileen Spinelli's "Sophie's Masterpiece" and Deborah Hopkinson's "Fannie in the Kitchen".
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 3 sources, 2002, $ 53.95
Abstract This paper will discuss the three books that would be chosen for the annual in 2000 for Caldecott Award Nomination for best young persons book. By understanding how these books are, the three best for the award, we can see why they were chosen for this merit. The three chosen books are: "Nobody in Particular", by Molly Bang, Eileen Spinelli's "Sophie's Masterpiece" and Deborah Hopkinson's "Fannie in the Kitchen", illustrated by Nancy Carpenter. By realizing the merits of these books, a choice can be made to best select the nominees for the award.
Abstract This paper discusses and analyzes the essay "Sex, Lies and Conversation" by Deborah Tannen. Specifically, it evaluates the essay according to several key questions, considering the background on the author and the topic, tone and genre of the essay. The paper contends that Tannen's essay clearly shows many of the differences in communication styles between men and women and explains what they mean to the very foundations of our society. The paper also claims that Tannen's essay indicates that communication is central to a solid marriage, but it is also central to just about everything important in our society, from personal relationships to business relations and far beyond.
From the Paper "What is also interesting is how Tannen described the physical communication styles of men and women. Women tend to look at each other when they are talking, while men tend to look away from each other when they are talking. This gives the woman the feeling that a man is not listening to her when they communicate, and from this example it is easy to see why. That this communication style is also learned at a young age is clear, and it is a little bit disconcerting to see how so many communication patterns learned as children stay with us throughout our adults lives. "
Abstract This paper examines Deborah Tannen's essay "There Is No Unmarked Woman" and discusses the effectiveness of the author's observations and argument, and her assumption about her audience. It includes a personal assessment of the essay.
From the Paper " Deborah Tannen's essay There Is No Unmarked Woman successfully illuminates the cultural peculiarity of judging women by their appearance or other factors but not judging men for the same things. As Tannen points out everything a .."
This paper analyzes the books "Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work" by Deborah Tannen and "Workforce 2020" by Richard W. Judy and Carol D'Amico.
Abstract The paper discusses Deborah Tannen's work, "Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work", which describes the difficulties women face when they attain positions of authority. The paper shows how women are perceived as mothers, rather than leaders or managers. The paper also looks at Richard W. Judy and Carol D'Amico's work, "Workforce 2020", which discusses how workers will need to prepare for the coming years in the workforce and be prepared for more change than ever before.
From the Paper "Stereotyping, as in "mother," "nurse," "teacher," and many other stereotypes about women are also at work here. There are many stereotypes for women that follow them into the workplace, whether they are justified or not. These stereotypes are used throughout society, not just in the workplace, and they add to the divide between men and women in authority. Even the news media uses stereotypes in unflattering ways, which simply reinforces the stereotypes and the behavior. Tannen gives several examples of media describing women in power in unflattering feminine tunes, something that is far less common with men in power."
Abstract The paper examines "A'rn't I a Woman?" by Deborah Gray White, which focuses on the roles of females in the pre-Civil War American society.
The paper discusses White's belief that female slaves endured not only racism but sexism and how stereotypes of both black women and white mistresses were totally unfair and untrue. The paper looks at how White explains the black female slaves' cultural survival. The paper concludes that the metaphorical question, "Ar'n't I a Woman?" is answered by the historical record of courage, resistance, survival and female heroism that comprised the experience of black African-American women during this period.
From the Paper "The historians of slavery of an earlier generation, as exemplified by Ulrich B. Phillips, painted a somewhat romanticized picture of slave life on the plantations that would be considered distorted and oversimplified by modern historical standards. This was in keeping with the ideology of "sectional healing" after the Civil War, in which whites in the North and South reunified under the infamous Tilden Hays Deal of 1877. That pact essentially sealed the fate of the political and economic reforms attempted under Reconstruction, completed the evacuation of the progressive Union Army from the South, and allowed white supremacy to return for many subsequent decades, until it was successfully challenged in the 1950s and 1960s by the modern Civil Rights Movement. Phillips distorted picture of the Old South featuring blissful student slaves on the plantation-as-school was challenged historians of the 1950s such as Kenneth Stampp and Stanley Elkins."
Abstract This paper examines how, in her article entitled "Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why is it So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?", author Deborah Tannen examines the complex communication relationship that exists between men and women. Specifically, the paper looks at Tannen's point that, although men talk more in public, women talk more in the house and the result is a genuine communication breakdown which causes distress in marriages.
From the Paper "However, as the research of Tennan shows, this is not the case. According to Tennan's research, the film What Women Want does nothing more than demonize men as being sexist and incapable of understanding women. In actuality, this is far from the truth. Instead, the feeling of being misunderstood is mutual, with both sides being at fault due to the role that gender upbringing creates. In other words, its not that men don't know what women want or that women don't know what men want, the issue is that men and women don't know how to talk to each other. Until this is understood, such stereotypical movies as What Women Want will continue to draw laughs."
