Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Philosophies of Ecology


Philosophies of Ecology
This paper compares Norwegian philosopher Arme Naess' ecology philosophy called "deep ecology" with Indian author Ramachandra Guha's ecological philosophy of "anthropocentrism".
2,540 words (approx. 10.2 pages) | 3 sources | MLA | 2005 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper explains that Arme Naess' philosophy of "deep ecology" encourages respect for the environment, not because humans depend on nature, but because nature and its inhabitants have inherent value. The author points out that Ramachandra Guha's ecological philosophy of "anthropocentrism" declares that all environmental responsibility is derived from human interests alone, which challenges this "deep ecology" philosophy. The paper concludes that Ramachandra Guha, who alleges that "shallow ecology" is sufficient for providing a satisfactory ethic of obligation and concern for the non-human world, is not rational; rather the concept of "deep ecology" needs to be extended especially toward non-human individuals, wilderness areas and across time and species.

From the Paper:

"Assuming characteristically anthropocentric perspectives and values is a defect, we should, instead, assume a biocentric perspective. We should certainly abandon crude conceptions of human needs that equate them with the sort of needs that are satisfied by extravagant resource use. One of the problems with shallow ecology lies in anthropocentrism, specifically the fact that they are characteristically short-term, sectional, and self-regarding. Suppose that astronomers detect a modest asteroid on collision course with Earth. The impending collision would be perfectly natural. Such periodic disruptive events are natural, though they probably destroy most of the then extant large life forms. These times of renewal provide opportunities for smaller, flexible organisms to radiate opportunistically into vacated niches, and life goes on. There is little doubt that our demise would provide comparable opportunities for development that we currently prevent. Even then, we should step aside so that evolution can continue on its majestic course."

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Philosophies of Ecology (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 12, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Philosophies-of-Ecology/66024

MLA Citation:

"Philosophies of Ecology" 15 January 2012. Web. 12 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Philosophies-of-Ecology/66024>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 46.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

JPWrite US
Publisher Since:
Jan 31, 2006
Our writers come from all academic backgrounds,have experience as professional writers, and love to write. We require that they pass a writing test before we agree to hire them. This why we have such a high rate of customer satisfaction.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success