Nietzsche and Lenin

Paper Summary:

The paper discusses the philosophies of Nietzsche and Lenin, noting marked similarities between them in terms of elitism. The writer proposes that, despite the fact that they differ widely in general viewpoint and specific delineations, it is nonetheless clear that both are of the opinion that a certain sort of human being is better than another. The paper examines how the main contrast between the two philosophies is that Nietzsche's "Superman" is under obligation only to promote his own evolution, while Lenin's superior human being is socially obliged to uplift the masses until equilibrium is reached.

From the Paper:

"In distinguishing between his Superman and the masses, Nietzsche distinguishes between the slave and master morality. The slave morality normally belongs to the unevolved, who emphasizes evil. This emphasis is based upon the resentment of the powerless towards those who are truly gifted. The only way in which the powerless can then gain a sense of power is by imposing thousands of rules, regulations and philosophies regarding how to live. The Superman however subscribes to the master morality. He, along with other talented and evolved individuals, do not resent, but respect each other as masters."

Sample of Sources Used:

• Christman, Henry M. (ed.). Essential Works of Lenin. Haymarket, 2005.
• Pearson, Keith Ansell & Large, Duncan. A Nietzsche Reader. Blackwell, 2005.

More papers on Nietzsche and Lenin:

• Analytical Essay # 142976 : "Nietzsche And The Girl Who Stole The Computer"
• Analytical Essay # 86654 : "Nietzsche and Kierkegaard"
• Analytical Essay # 142193 : "Plato, Nietzsche, and the Good Life"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: