Morality by Marlowe and Wilde

Paper Summary:

This paper discusses the portrayal of morality in the plays, "The Tragical History of Dr. Faustus" by Christopher Marlowe (1995) and "The Importance of Being Ernest" by Oscar Wilde (1985). More specifically, the paper looks at the plots of the plays and then compares and contrasts immorality and hypocrisy in the main characters of these two works.

From the Paper:

"These plays address morality from the mores of their own times. Marlowe did not permit Faustus to be redeemed. Faustus' lack of moral insight was, perhaps, as great a factor in his condemnation as his lack of soul. His inability to change and mature, as evidenced by his petty tricks and lack of success despite his power, left Faustus with no recourse other than damnation. Jack, however, was able to change his life, learning the importance of being "earnest" in his dealings. It is through this insight and through his maturation as a moral human being that he is worthy of redemption, while Faustus is not."

Sample of Sources Used:

• Marlowe, C. (1995). Doctor Faustus and other plays. D. Bevington & E. Rasmussen (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Wilde, O. (2005). The importance of being Ernest. P. Moliken & L. Miller (eds.). Cheswold, Delaware: Literary Touchstone Press-Prestwick House.

More papers on Morality by Marlowe and Wilde:

• Analytical Essay # 132989 : "Morality in Two Plays"
• Essay # 31313 : "Marlowe And Shakespeare"
• Comparison Essay # 95018 : "The Morality of Science and the Literary Arts"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: