Language to Leadership in Eastern Philosophy

Paper Summary:

Both Confucianism and Taoism hold strikingly differing positions on the importance and significance of language. This paper shows that, while this conflict may initially seem purely academic, these positions form the foundation of their ideologies, influencing subsequent positions on every aspect of life, right up to the correct way to lead a nation.

From the Paper:

"Thus, the accuracy of language serves as a foundation for all other abilities, including the acquisition of knowledge and leadership. This foundation should be solid and strong, without embellishment, and without exaggeration. Confucius often displays exquisite care in his own language, especially when he is asked whether or not a specific person fits a certain title, such as "ren" or "scholar." He is also conscious of his overall choice of words and tone: "At court, when speaking with officers of lower rank, he was pleasant and affable; when speaking with officers of upper rank, he was formal and proper." His own care, and the distain with which he frequently refers to those who use fanciful language or who cannot back up their speech with actions, demonstrates his advocacy of speech as a concrete, firm resting place for ideas. "Words," he explains, "should convey their message, and leave it at that.""

More papers on Language to Leadership in Eastern Philosophy:

• Research Paper # 32504 : "From Communism to Capitalism in Eastern Europe"
• Term Paper # 122747 : "Crime and Eastern Philosophy"
• Comparison Essay # 12153 : "Life & Death in Eastern Philosophy"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: