Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

"Laboratory Life" and "Beloved"


# 118325
"Laboratory Life" and "Beloved"
A comparison and contrast of the epistemic methods utilized in Bruno Latour and Larry Woolgar's "Laboratory Life" and Toni Morrison's novel "Beloved".
1,795 words (approx. 7.2 pages) | 2 sources | MLA | 2009 United States


Paper Summary:

The paper juxtaposes Bruno Latour and Larry Woolgar's "Laboratory Life" with Toni Morrison's novel "Beloved" to highlight these books' methods of knowledge gathering, synthesis, or creation. The paper discusses the scientific research in "Laboratory Life" and the mythical, supernatural epistemology of "Beloved" and shows how while both yield knowledge about the world, we cannot know which knowledge is "truer" or "more superior" to the other. The paper therefore comes to the conclusion that the epistemology of each narrative is incommensurable with the other.

Outline:
Laboratory Life
Beloved
Epistemological Issues of the Texts

From the Paper:

"Laboratory Life is an ethnographic account of a neurobiology laboratory in California. In the first chapters, Latour and Woolgar describe the daily activities of the scientists using the lens of an anthropologist, using "the same cold and unblinking eye with which cells, or hormones, or chemical reactions are studied" (Latour and Woolgar, 12). In other words, Laboratory Life details scientific activities in the same way that an anthropologist describes the activities of a tribe in Papua New Guinea.
"In Latour and Woolgar's observations, scientists produce facts by literary inscription, which is the material process by which scientists turn physical matter into "data", and finally into a "fact," or a sentence published in a journal (Latour and Woolgar, 45-53). For example, lab technicians extract liquids from rats' brains, and load the extracted liquid into various machines that produce a paper printout. This printout is "data", and the scientists interpret this data through discussions, letters, and phone calls. After interpreting the data, scientists write a paper that is published in a journal (Latour and Woolgar, 105-151)."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Latour, Bruno and Larry Woolgar. Laboratory Life. Princeton University Press: New Jersey, 1986.
  • Morrison, Toni. Beloved. Penguin: New York, 1987.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

"Laboratory Life" and "Beloved" (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Laboratory-Life-and-Beloved/118325

MLA Citation:

""Laboratory Life" and "Beloved"" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Laboratory-Life-and-Beloved/118325>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 34.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Jay Writtings LLC US
Publisher Since:
Jul 22, 2009
We are a writing company that employs professional freelance writers. All of their work is original and of a very high level of academic writing.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success