Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Kant versus Hume


Kant versus Hume
This paper argues in favor of Immanuel Kant's philosophical outlook over that of David Hume.
2,208 words (approx. 8.8 pages) | 0 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper examines the philosophical outlooks of Immanuel Kant and David Hume, with the author concluding that Kant's perspective is preferable. Kant's opinion on how one gains knowledge is contrasted with Hume's. Both perspectives on the contribution of experience to knowledge and the role of the "self" and a personal "world" are also considered.

Outline:
Introduction
Exposition
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"In his principal book entitled, "The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals," Kant explains why only the categorical imperative is the valid standard of moral obligation (Abbott 2006, Richards 2006, McCormick 2006). He limits his discussion to specific willful actions in moral situations or conditions, where the will is, or should be, influenced only by reason or rational considerations, rather than by subjective or emotional considerations, such as laziness, convenience, or advantage . He writes that morality involves what actions are necessary and that concept comes only from reason or rational considerations. These rational considerations must, in turn, be a "single principle of obligation (Richards)." It must also be stated as a command and has no reference to, or weighed against, the consequences of the action. Kant then says that only the categorical imperative fulfills all these conditions (Richards, Abbott, McCormick)."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Morals by Immanuel Kant. Project Gutenberg Library Archive Foundation, 2006. http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfiles?fk_files=10995
  • Lavine, Thelma Z. From Socrates to Sartre: the Philosophic Quest. reissue edition.
  • Bantam Books, 1985
  • McCormick, Matt. Categorical Imperative. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006. http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/kantmeta.htm
  • Morris, William Edward. David Hume. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2001. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Kant versus Hume (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Kant-versus-Hume/95276

MLA Citation:

"Kant versus Hume" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Kant-versus-Hume/95276>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 41.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

hicaliber US
Publisher Since:
Feb 28, 2007
We employ a large pool of writers that specialize in a variety of topics. In addition, they are all highly skilled researchers and editors. Our papers are of a very high quality and we have a very high satisfaction rate with our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success