Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

International Arbitration


# 114857
International Arbitration
A comparison of the US approach and the French approach to international commercial arbitration among private actors.
1,845 words (approx. 7.4 pages) | 8 sources | MLA | 2009 France


Paper Summary:

This paper discusses the success of international commercial arbitration among private actors and the desire of many prominent legal systems to ensure the respect of their public policies, especially in the business sector. It examines the US approach with the well-known Mitsubishi decision of 1985 and then looks at the French approach in the landmark Labinal case.

Table of Contents:
US and France : A Convergent Approach as to the Arbitrability of Competition Law
The US Approach : The Mitsubishi Case
The French Approach : The Labinal Case
US and France : A Divergent Approach as to the Notion of "Second Look"
A Large Appreciation of the "Second Look" according to the American and the European Case Law
The Controversial and Restrictive Approach of the Recent French Case Law on "Second Look"

From the Paper:

"In his commentary on the decision, Christophe Seraglini clearly showed his disappointment as regards the outcome of the case, insofar as the equilibrium to be found between the prohibition of judicial review on the merits and the necessary respect of competition law issues seemed broken in his eyes. In particular, he pointed towards the danger of an artificiality of the control of the award in these conditions, which could lead in the future to an inefficient protection of the international public order . In any event, such criticisms of the approach of the Cour d'Appel de Paris thus indicate that the debate has now shifted from the scope of the notion of "arbitrability" itself to the role of the judge a posteriori, to the overall benefit of international arbitration."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Paris, 19 mai 1993, Labinal, Revue de l'Arbitrage 1993, p 645, note Ch. Jarrosson.
  • Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc, 473 U.S. 614 (1985).
  • American Safety Equipment Corp v J.P. Maguire & Co, 391 F.2d 821 (1968).
  • Scherk v Alberto-Culver Co, 417 U.S. 506 (1974).
  • Paris, 20 janvier 1989, Revue de l'Arbitrage 1989, p.280, obs Idot.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

International Arbitration (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-International-Arbitration/114857

MLA Citation:

"International Arbitration" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-International-Arbitration/114857>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 35.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

swill85 FR
Publisher Since:
Jun 25, 2009
I have a dual degree in English and French law from two prominent institutions: a LLB from King's College London (First Class Honours) and a Maîtrise de Droit from the University of La Sorbonne in Paris (with honours). I also have a Master degree in Global Business Law from both La Sorbonne and Columbia Law School.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success