Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document
Why AcaDemon? Find Your Paper Improve Your Paper Publish Your Papers for Resale Custom papers


Giddens, Habermas and Bourdieu on Social Structure

# 118242
A comparison of the theories of Anthony Giddens, Jurgen Habermas and Pierre Bourdieu on the structure of society.
2,401 words (approx. 9.6 pages) | 5 sources | MLA | 2009 | United States
Published on: Jan 15, 2010

Paper Summary:

This paper discusses and compares the social theories of Anthony Giddens, Jurgen Habermas and Pierre Bourdieu. The writer explains that according to Giddens, Habermas, and Bourdieu, the agency serves a very specific purpose for the individual within society. Giddens in 1984 in his "Constitution of Society," proposed the social theory of structuration, using structural perspectives such as agency/structure and subjective/objective. The writer explores how Bourdieu and Habermas add to Giddens' theory and perspectives and how each theorist diverges in their approach to the humanistic side of the structuration. Giddens identifies the structuration process overall as an organic and autonomous process arising from the conventional forces in society, Habermas distinguishes three categories of the influence of human cognition on the structuration process in society, and Bourdieu, the most philosophical of the three, identifies the means by which the subjectivity of man gives rise to an ordering that results in a society's bureaucratic and hierarchical formation.

From the Paper:

"Giddens agrees with Habermas as far as the individualized approach to social structure, demonstrating the means by which certain bureaucratic qualities are imparted and specifically designed to address the forward progress, evolution, and social development that is being inculcated with the development of society. While Giddens acknowledges the social structure as specifically maintaining overarching social tendencies within the social bureaucracy, he sees structuration as a combination between the development of ideals of the human intellectual instinct as well as the social forces within the environment."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • "Anthony Giddens: The theory of structuration." 2007: http://www.theory.org.uk/giddens2.htm
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. "Classes and classifications." 1979: http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu.htm
  • Bourdieu, Pierre, translated by Nice, Richard. Distinctions. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. 1984: Harvard University Press, 1984.
  • "The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas." 2007: http://physicsed.buffalostate.edu/danowner/habcritthy.html
  • Wacquant, Loic. "Pierre Bourdieu." May 2006: http://sociology.berkeley.edu/faculty/wacquant/wacquant_pdf/PIERREBOURDIEU-KEYTHINK-REV2006.pdf

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Giddens, Habermas and Bourdieu on Social Structure (2012, May 06). Retrieved May 25, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Giddens-Habermas-and-Bourdieu-on-Social-Structure/118242

MLA Citation:

"Giddens, Habermas and Bourdieu on Social Structure" 06 May 2012. Web. 25 May. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Giddens-Habermas-and-Bourdieu-on-Social-Structure/118242>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 49.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Jay Writtings LLC US
Publisher Since:
Jul 22, 2009
We are a writing company that employs professional freelance writers. All of their work is original and of a very high level of academic writing.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success
Social
Google Plus Page YouTube Channel Podcasts on iTunes