Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Errors in Language


# 109979
Errors in Language
A comparison of the mistakes in English contract law and German contract law.
4,285 words (approx. 17.1 pages) | 13 sources | MLA | 2008 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper examines the concept of mistakes, as it compares and contrasts the role of mistakes in English contract law and German contract law. Also, the paper presents a report that confirms the role of mistakes in English contract law which complements, more than contrasts, German contract law. The paper explores various questions about how mistakes are dealt with in both English and German contract law.

From the Paper:

"The equities of the party relying on the declaration are protected by his/her claim for negative damages. The adoption of the subjective standard will no doubt increase litigation and make the decision of actual cases more difficult. Also, ingenious council may routinely occupy much of the courts' time with discussions as to the probable operation of a given mind under hypothetical circumstances. If the other party is clearly entitled either to positive or two negative damages, the court will frequently find a difficult challenge deciding the management of damages are to be measured".

Sample of Sources Used:

  • The Columbia World of Quotations. (1996). New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. 9 January 2008 < www.bartleby.com/66/>.
  • Duhaime, Lloyd . "Mistake, Rectification & Misrepresentation." (2007, May 7). 9 January 2008 <http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/Contracts/tabid/339/articleType/ArticleView/ rticleId/90/Default.aspx>.
  • Gordley, James, ed. The Enforceability of Promises in European Contract Law. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Questia. 9 Jan. 2008 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=105014728>.
  • Chen-Wishart, Mindy. "6In Defence of Unjust Factors: a Study of Rescission for Duress, Fraud and Exploitation." Unjustified Enrichment Key Issues in Comparative Perspective. Ed. David Johnston and Reinhard Zimmermann. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 159-193. Questia. 9 Jan. 2008 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=105072254>.
  • Du Plessis, Jacques. "7 Fraud, Duress and Unjustified Enrichment: a Civil-Law Perspective." Unjustified Enrichment Key Issues in Comparative Perspective. Ed. David Johnston and Reinhard Zimmermann. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 194 224. Questia. 9 Jan. 2008 <http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=105072273>.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Errors in Language (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Errors-in-Language/109979

MLA Citation:

"Errors in Language" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Comparison-Essay-Errors-in-Language/109979>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 68.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

cee-cee US
Publisher Since:
Aug 10, 2008
We are a writing company that has been in business for 15 years and have been submitting papers to AcaDemon for the last five plus years. Our papers cover a variety of topics because we have excellent writers capable of writing on a variety of topics. We specialize in research and can write all paper levels and all paper types.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success