"Democracy's Discontent" vs. "Democracy in America"

Paper Summary:

This paper discusses how Alexis de Tocqueville in "Democracy in America" and Michael J. Sandel in "Democracy's Discontent" both address issues of democracy, freedom, the role of government, and the good citizen. It looks at how their viewpoints differ because they write at different times of history. De Tocqueville writes at a time when democracy is a novel ideal. Aristocracy has been the main form of government, and this, therefore, plays a major role in his writing. Sandel, on the other hand, deals with contemporary issues such as the global community and the implications of new technology and diminishing boundaries among people.

From the Paper:

"De Tocqueville stresses the importance of civil equality in the achievement of true democracy. This equality implies the lack of divisions and barriers between social classes. This is the equality that he sees in American culture as opposed to European culture that still subscribes to the aristocratic means of government. The democratic ideal implies more freedom than would be possible with an aristocratic government: "Let us suppose that all the people take a part in the government, and that each one of them has an equal right to take a part in it. As no one is different from his fellows, none can exercise a tyrannical power; men will be perfectly free because they are all entirely equal" (De Tocqueville, Book II, Chapter I)."

More papers on "Democracy's Discontent" vs. "Democracy in America":

• Essay # 84664 : "In America" "
• Term Paper # 109875 : "Illiteracy vs. Literacy in America"
• Analytical Essay # 65174 : "Democracy in America" by Alexis de Tocqueville"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: