"1984" and "Lord of the Flies"

Paper Summary:

In the novels "1984" by George Orwell and the "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding, the ruling parties experience virtually no consequences from the populous for their actions. In "1984" this is done by design, but in the "Lord of the Flies" it comes about through natural human impulses. The paper explains how in both cases, however, the competing human drives for order and for random gratification come to rest upon forms of social organization that satisfy certain basic desires of mankind while sacrificing power to a small group of individuals.

From the Paper:

"In Golding's novel the struggle between order and chaos are most clearly exemplified through the characters of Jack and Ralph. The power that Ralph wields over the other boys is sustained by their young understandings of justice and the difference between right and wrong. Ralph is willing to delegate duties and confer some of his power upon others in the hopes of eventual rescue; this is his primary objective. Jack, on the other hand-obtaining only a taste of power-craves more, and takes every opportunity to undermine Ralph's authority. The notion of civilization and a return to the rest of the world are completely lost within Jack's base aims for supremacy. When Jack finally comes to power his rule has no objective other than self perpetuation."

More papers on "1984" and "Lord of the Flies":

• Comparison Essay # 133334 : "Lord of the Flies and 1984"
• Comparison Essay # 103901 : "Lord of the Flies" and "1984"
• Analytical Essay # 124915 : "Lord of the Flies" and Leadership"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: