This paper analyzes the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and looks at the related effects and reactions.
Written in 2007; 3,058 words; 10 sources; MLA; $ 89.95
Paper Summary:
In this article the writer discusses the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). The writer notes that this Act is tremendously controversial, despite the fact that at the time of its passage most people agreed that some type of education reform was long overdue. This article looks at the legislation leading up to the NCLB and examines its goals. Further, the writer examines various reactions to the Act. The writer notes that although commentators have suggested that the NCLB might present several legal issues, there has been a surprising scarcity of litigation surrounding the Act. However, the writer points out that this relative lack of litigation should not be seen as an acceptance of the requirements of the NCLB, but instead the lack of litigation must be revisited in a timely manner. The writer concludes that if people desire changes in the NCLB, they may be forced to seek them through the legislative, rather than the judicial progress.
From the Paper:
"Despite its lofty goals, the NCLB has been met with serious opposition by some surprising segments of society; educators, parents, and state government officials. Many states believe that the NCLB's major problem is that it permits the federal government to preempt states in their educational programs. While the federal government has had ancillary involvement in state and local education programs in the past, the NCLB signals a dramatic change in the structure of the American public education system because it places severe contingencies upon federal financial aid. Parents seem to mention two central problems with the NCLB. The first problem is that the NCLB requires students to pass standardized tests in order to advance, with little regard for individual students' differences. The second problem is that the NCLB punishes schools with low test scores by withdrawing funding; the result is that the most disadvantaged children end up receiving the least federal aid. Educators agree with parents' concerns, and also express the concern that the NCLB's focus on standardized teacher testing ignores years of teacher classroom experience. The most controversial charge that critics have made against the NCLB is that it may result in the de facto resegregation of certain schools."
We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.
This Free Term Paper Abstract is a part of our Term Paper Library.Here you can purchase research papers, examples of essays, academic dissertations, articles, notes, analytical papers, book reports, stories and poems. We have thousands of persuasive, point-of-view, narrative, critical, compare and contrast and other types of essays in our Library. You can also find here Term papers on "No Child Left Behind", Essays on "No Child Left Behind", Research papers on "No Child Left Behind", Student papers on "No Child Left Behind", Book reports on "No Child Left Behind", Dissertation on "No Child Left Behind", Thesis on "No Child Left Behind", Summary of paper on "No Child Left Behind", Articles written on "No Child Left Behind".
Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on