Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Reinforcement Theory


# 109581
Reinforcement Theory
A analysis of the reinforcement theory and its applications.
3,050 words (approx. 12.2 pages) | 6 sources | APA | 2008


Paper Summary:

This paper examines the reinforcement theory, the most well known and popular behavioral approach to motivation. The paper discusses the theory as a contingency used to increase desirable behaviors by rewarding the person engaging in the behavior with a pleasant consequence that is of value to that person and speaks of how and when the reinforcers will be administered. The author includes an example of the theory in action with a case study.

Outline:
Reinforcement theory
Reinforcement contingencies
Reinforcement schedules
Application
Subject - Significant other
Behavior and Measure - Not calling by 9 p.m.
Contingencies: Positive and Negative
Results

From the Paper:

"Skinner's third contingency is punishment which is essentially the opposite of positive reinforcement. This method of reinforcement involves experiencing a negative or unpleasant consequence due to engaging in an unwanted behavior. This is a contingency that results in the decrease or cessation of unwanted behaviors. However, in order for this contingency to be effective the consequence must immediately follow the behavior. Although it is believed by some to be as successful as positive reinforcement, it is considered to be the least preferred type of reinforcement by many behaviorists and moral philosophers."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Daniels, Aubrey C., & Daniels, James E. (2006). Positive Reinforcement: Misunderstood and misused. T+D, March 2006 (3), 60-61. Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly,
  • J.H. & Konopaske, R. (2006). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Process. New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin. Lauer, Charles S. (2004).
  • Positive Reinforcement. Modern Healthcare, 34 (47), 22-24. Leslie, Julian C. (1997).
  • Ethical Implications of Behavior Modification: Historical and Current Issues. The Psychological Record, 47, (Fall, 1997), 637-648. Staddon, J.E.R. & Cerutti, D.T. (2003).
  • Operant Conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 115-144. Timberlake, William (2004). Is the Operant Contingency Enough for a Science of Purposive Behavior?

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Reinforcement Theory (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Case-Study-Reinforcement-Theory/109581

MLA Citation:

"Reinforcement Theory" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Case-Study-Reinforcement-Theory/109581>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 53.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Peter Pen
Publisher Since:
Aug 29, 2003
Our staff is comprised of professional writers, academics, editors, and journalists that have extensive writing experience. We write knowledgeably and skillfully on all topics and are confident in the quality of our papers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success