"The Innocent Man"

Paper Summary:

This paper examines and reviews John Grisham's non-fiction book, "The Innocent Man." It describes the plot of the story of a man named Ron Williamson who was suspected and convicted of a murder that he did not commit. The paper describes how the book reflects all of the problems within the criminal justice system, especially for those who cannot afford to hire their own council.

From the Paper:

"On April 10, 1997 Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver affirmed Judge Seay, and agreed that Ron had been wrongly convicted. The Capital Trial Division was assigned the case to retry. The lawyers explained they would be using DNA, a sure way to know if he was innocent or guilty. Judge Tom Landrith was to hear the case. On July 12, 1997, Ron left McAlester, never to return. It took two months in the mental hospital before the doctor would certify that Ron was competent to stand trial, but that continued psychiatric care would be necessary. December 10 was the date set for new trial. But, after having Ron on the stand for some time, it was obvious he was not yet mentally ready for trial."

More papers on "The Innocent Man":

• Comparison Essay # 936 : "The Invisible Man" as a Parallel to a Jazz Composition"
• Book Review # 107145 : "A Man Named Dave"
• Book Review # 104769 : "Angela Carter's "The Company of Wolves"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: