"Hamlet"

Paper Summary:

The paper discusses how Hamlet kills Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to avoid his own death, but he submits to the duel at the end of the play because that is what fate deals out to him. The paper describes how rather than trying to orchestrate violent plots and plays, Hamlet learns that one cannot appoint one's self the judge of humanity, but one must be ready to submit to fate. The paper shows how in the end Hamlet dies, but he sees justice done, makes peace with his mother and has a sense of accomplishment from killing the king as an open act of vengeance rather than a private act of anger.

From the Paper:

"At first, the play "Hamlet" seems to support the idea that revenge is justified. King Claudius is the murderer of Hamlet's father. Claudius also schemes to kill Hamlet. Fortinbras, the Norwegian king, takes over the Danish throne at the end of the play, partly as a result of his expedition to avenge his own father. Laertes wishes to kill Hamlet because Hamlet accidentally killed Laertes' father Polonius. But despite the presence of all of these other avengers in the play, Hamlet's doubts about committing murder makes him the most sympathetic, and also the most significant character for the audience. Hamlet suggests that it is critical that human beings reflect upon their lots in life, and act with reason and passion in a state of balance."

Sample of Sources Used:

• Shakespeare, William. "The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark." MIT Classics Homepage: Shakespeare. 8 Mar 2006. <http://www-tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/hamlet/ >

More papers on "Hamlet":

• Analytical Essay # 5961 : "Hamlet"
• Analytical Essay # 4431 : "Hamlet": Act III Scene II"
• Analytical Essay # 3438 : "Reading Hamlet as a Murder Mystery"
• Analytical Essay # 2086 : "The Other Type Of Hero: The Tragedy of Hamlet"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: