Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

"Critique Of Pure Reason"


# 97640
"Critique Of Pure Reason"
An analysis of the arguments presented by Immanuel Kant in "Critique of Pure Reason."
903 words (approx. 3.6 pages) | 2 sources | MLA | 2007 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper discusses Immanuel Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason," which is the great thinker's most critically acclaimed work. It presents Kant's numerous arguments in favor of the possibility of metaphysics and shows how he tried to establish a much-needed link between science and metaphysics. It also discusses how he tried to bridge the gap between reason and metaphysics with the help of priori and posteriori.

From the Paper:

"In the Critique, Kant invites science 'to undertake anew the most difficult of all its tasks, namely, that of self-knowledge, and to institute a tribunal which will assure to reason its lawful claims'. This tribunal is 'no other than the critique of pure reason' (Axi) and thus in the book Kant presented numerous arguments in favor of the possibility of metaphysics and tried to establish a much-needed link between science and metaphysics. Kant was fully aware of the shortcomings of both pure reason and pure metaphysics. He understood the problems posed by the two fields in exclusivity and hence tried to bridge the gap with the help of priori and posteriori. According to him we need a priori in order to move to posteriori. He feels that at some level all sciences require priori- i.e. a prior knowledge that mind just happens to possess and which happens to be true as well. The mind, Kant maintains, must be capable of holding true knowledge or generating it. For example it is important for it to know that night changes into day and day into night because of some heavenly changes. When it possesses this knowledge, it can move on to posterior to test the truth of it."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • N. Kemp Smith, A Commentary to Kant's 'Critique of Pure Reason', 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1930)
  • Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Werner S. Pluhar (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

"Critique Of Pure Reason" (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Book-Review-Critique-Of-Pure-Reason/97640

MLA Citation:

""Critique Of Pure Reason"" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Book-Review-Critique-Of-Pure-Reason/97640>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 19.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

supercalifragilistic US
Publisher Since:
Jun 18, 2007
We have superior research and writing experts on our staff of writers and their skills are reflected in the papers they write. Writers on staff have achieved very high academic standings and all enjoy a professional status as writers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success