Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Critical Review of Two Books on Women's Suffrage


# 104502
Critical Review of Two Books on Women's Suffrage
An analysis and comparison of "Women, Politics and Media: Uneasy Relations in Comparative Perspective" by Karen Ross and "Women, Power, and Politics" by Margaret Stacey and Marion Price.
2,633 words (approx. 10.5 pages) | 5 sources | APA | 2008 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper compares and contrasts "Women, Politics and Media: Uneasy Relations in Comparative Perspective" by Karen Ross and "Women, Power, and Politics" by Margaret Stacey and Marion Price. It discusses how the books both deal with the issue of women's political roles (or lack thereof). The paper concludes that despite their differences, both books will be of interest to feminist scholars, though for different reasons.

From the Paper:

"Both of these books will be of interest to many feminist scholars, particularly those interested in the progress of women in the political sphere. Both are therefore highly recommended. However, for the reader or student with a fairly broad interest in the subject, Stacey and Price's book will be more useful, as it provides an extremely insightful overview of the subject area. Moreover, the fact that they challenge several conventional notions means that the book makes for thought-provoking reading. On the other hand, Ross's book will probably be of more limited appeal, focusing as it does on a more narrow area of the broad subject matter of women in politics. Finally, Stacey and Price (1981) is a substantially more pleasant read, in that it takes a positive view and is optimistic. Ross (2002), by contrast, is positively depressing. One ends up feeling almost hopeless for the future of democracy. Therefore, although these are both good books and impressive works of scholarship, if you have time to read just one of these books, I would strongly recommend you choose Stacey and Price's book."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Centre for the Advancement of Women in Politics. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.qub.ac.uk/cawp/research.html
  • Duffy, Ann. (1986). Reformulating Power for Women. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 23: 22+.
  • Ross, Karen. (2002). Women, Politics and Media: Uneasy Relations in Comparative Perspective. Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc.
  • Stacey, Margaret and Marion Price. (1981). Women, Power, and Politics. London and New York: Tavistock Publications.
  • Times, The. (February 25, 2004). Obituary. Professor Margaret Stacey - Sociologist whose passion for the rights of women and children took feminism in new directions. Retrieved from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/obituaries/article1028851.ece

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Critical Review of Two Books on Women's Suffrage (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Book-Review-Critical-Review-of-Two-Books-on-Women's-Suffrage/104502

MLA Citation:

"Critical Review of Two Books on Women's Suffrage" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Book-Review-Critical-Review-of-Two-Books-on-Women's-Suffrage/104502>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 47.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Quality Writers US
Publisher Since:
Oct 23, 2007
We are a writing company that's been in business for over 7 years. We write top quality papers and have excellent feedback from all of our customers.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success