Abstract This paper describes how the Great Depression was a calamity that changed the lives of all Canadians. The paper relates that the government of R.B. Bennett instituted a number of new polices, and although widely discredited at the time, laid the foundations for economic recovery and Canada's modern welfare state. The paper also studies the beliefs and motivations of Bennett as an individual, and how his responses hastened the end of The Great Depression and the beginnings of a better life for Canadians.
From the Paper "The Great Depression was a calamity that changed the lives of all Canadians. In the three decades prior to the Great Depression, Canada had one of the world's fastest growing economies, experiencing only a brief downturn near the end of the Great War (Morton). The government of R.B. Bennett instituted a number of new polices, including the creation of work relief camps, increasing trade tariffs and creating a Third National Policy, known as the New Policy. The immediate effects of the initiatives were limited by factors outside of Bennett's control and their evaluation must be informed by an understanding of the environment in which they occurred. The prevailing attitudes of the times, a collapsing and changed economy, and Federal/Provincial squabbling over division of powers limited the effectiveness of the responses and created a mistaken belief that the Bennett government was ineffective. These policies, although widely discredited at the time, laid the foundations for economic recovery and Canada's modern welfare state.
"The policies of the Bennett government were shaped, in large part, by the attitudes and beliefs of the establishment. Many people, including the policymakers of the day, had experienced economic recessions, but these downturns in the economy had been relatively brief compared to the severity and duration of the Depression. In the run-up to the election, the previous Prime Minister, Mackenzie King, had refused to provide any federal aid to the provinces, believing the crisis would quickly pass (Bets). It is also important to note that the processes of urbanization and industrialization were of fairly recent origin in 1930, and the prevailing assumption that unemployment was a personal failing proved resilient even as the creation of a modern economy called such precepts into question. The policy responses laid out in The New Deal and the settling up of labour camps was an attempt to provide support and an opportunity for people to lift themselves out of the financial crisis. Financial assistance for those in need was seen, at the time, as a disincentive to finding work and a burden on the economy. Without work, many of the unemployed men gathered in cities seeking employment of any sort. The government feared that this mass of unemployed citizens would be fertile ground for the Communist party and the unions. The army chief, General Andy McNaughton warned Bennett that "In their ragged platoons, here are the prospective members of what Marx called the 'industrial reserve army, the storm troopers of the revolution'." The Bolshevik revolution in Russia, the Winnipeg General Strike, and ongoing labour unrest in the country were a growing concern for Bennett (Safarian). There was believed to be a need to ensure that the unemployed were not able to gather and mobilize in large numbers. Throughout his term in office, Bennett struggled with a desire to assist those in need. He was burdened by an unwillingness to enrich those he believed to be undeserving due to personal failings and by a fear of Communists fomenting revolution amongst the unemployed vagrants. Although evaluated from a modern perspective, his policies often exacerbated suffering and fomented dissent, they were informed by a need to create personal responsibility and ensure the safety of Canadian society."
Abstract This paper examines how John Locke's distinction between ideas and qualities, outlined in his "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding", would become a point of contention between Jonathan Bennett and Thomas Lennon. In particular, the paper takes a look at Bennet's book "Learning from Six Philosophers" and Lennon's critical article "Bennett on Ideas and Qualities in Locke's Essay". The paper concludes that Locke can be confusing at times because the distinction between ideas and qualities is not always clearly drawn in the text, but the ideas are more clear when closely examined by later thinkers.
From the Paper "In 1996, Jonathan Bennett offered his own version of a standard objection raised against Locke, that the distinction between ideas and qualities is ill-formed and exposes a fundamental confusion about ideas and qualities that runs throughout Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Bennett says that Locke tends to use the word "idea" to mean "quality." Bennett also says that the distinction is intended to be clear and that Locke addresses it by stating that whatever the mind perceives in itself is an idea, while qualities are those "ideas" that are produced I the mind by sensation of the object and quality in question. Locke uses a snowball as an example and says the snowball itself produces the ideas of white, cold, and round. These are qualities because they are ideas that are in the snowball and then imparted to the mind as the mind experiences the snowball."
Abstract In his book "Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream", Lerone Bennett claims that the glorification of Lincoln by Americans is not totally justified. He claims that Lincoln himself was a racist. In making these statements, an overall study of the issue of racism vs. slavery is discussed in a historical context.
From the paper:
"Lerone Bennett's book Forced into Glory : Abraham Lincoln's White Dream is designed to make any reader rethink all of her or his preconceptions about Lincoln. American schoolchildren are taught that Lincoln was the savior of our nation, a man so motivated by the highest of ideals in terms of both guaranteeing the continuing union of our states and ending slavery that he willingly put himself into deadly peril.
Bennett suggests that this is not quite an accurate picture, and indeed in some measure he must be right. No one is perfectly self sacrificing, no one perfectly good, no one perfectly wise. Lincoln was flawed as any great man. He was not, however, perhaps as flawed as Bennett makes him out to be."
Tags: abolishment, slavery, racist, reality, American, Gettysburg, military, Union
Abstract This paper summarizes and reviews the article "Against Gay Marriages" by William J. Bennett. The paper explains Bennett's belief that gay marriages are immoral and can cause confusion about marriage in future generations. The author agrees with Bennett's arguments that if Congress passes same-sex marriage laws, the definition of marriage, which is the legal union of a man as husband and woman as wife, would be challenged and would eventually cause social damage and detrimental to the society. The author also praises Bennett's choice of words in his article and his lack of biasness and generalizing when addressing the issue of gay marriage.
From the Paper "The author, William J. Bennett, is against gay marriage because he believes it will eventually cause a great amount of social damage. If we acknowledge the legal union of gay and lesbian couples that will force us to change the definition of marriage. Expanding the meaning of marriage to include same-sex marriage would make marriage hard to identify. The legal union of gay and lesbian couples would cause a lot of confusion among the youth. If the law acknowledges homosexual marriages as a legal equal to heterosexual marriage it will be detrimental to our society. For example: we will have to give homosexuals equal rights when adopting kids and we will also have to change the sex education program in public schools to teach that homosexual couples are equal to heterosexual couples."
Abstract This essay critically examines William J. Bennett's article "Drug Policy and the Intellectuals". The paper briefly summarizes the focus of Bennett's article as driven by the desire to validate current U.S. national and international policies regarding narcotics. The paper sets out what Bennett's main claim is and then follows by analyzing his rhetorical style in terms of logos, ethos, and pathos.
From the Paper " Article Analysis: Bennett's "Drug Policy and the Intellectuals" The purpose of this essay is to critically examine William J. Bennett's article "Drug Policy and the Intellectuals." IN brief, Bennett's article is driven by the desire to validate current U.S. national and international policies regarding narcotics. The large portion of Bennett's article is spent responding to the lack of fervor displayed by the intellectual community in the United States in support of contemporary U.S. drug policy. More precisely, this essay will be divided into several key sections. After setting out what Bennett's main claim in this article is, I will then follow by analyzing his rhetorical style in terms of logos, ethos, and pathos."
Abstract This paper reviews Alan Bennett's powerful book "Talking Heads", a compilation of many intriguing characters incorporated within six highly different monologues. It compares and contrasts the varied techniques employed by Bennett in the crafting and presentation of sustained, convincing and engaging voices for his protagonists. It looks at the use of techniques such as stereotypes, character self-denial, humour and moreover the use of powerful language, i.e. witticisms, idioms, cynicism and colloquialisms.
From the Paper "Bennett uses a variety of techniques to show the characters emotions in each monologue, some are the same and others are completely different. A change of subject is quite common. In "Soldiering On" Muriel's remorse and grief are shown quite sparsely but when it is shown, "then I felt a bit choked" the subject is changed immediately, ?Anyway the tablet did the trick.? She appears extremely distraught about her husbands? death but the way she has been brought up dictates her behaviour as "keeping up appearances". Bennett shows Susan's emotions in "Bed among the lentils" with the use of frequent sarcasm towards her husband, herself and others. ?Geoffrey praying in that pausy way he does.? ?For once I got it right.? "Fan club running around in small circles" Mrs Frobisher even went as far as to squeeze my elbow.? Susan created the feeling of being useless and unloved, and basically being in the way."
Abstract The paper discusses "Habeas Corpus", a comedy written in the early 1970s by a British playwright Alan Bennett. The play is set in the 1960s Britain, the era of sexual revolution and turmoil in society. The play is set up in a typical British town in the 1960s. The paper analyzes how, on the surface it is a farce about sexual relations, and when it was first shown in the early 1970s, it must have been somewhat daring, even scandalous.
Abstract The paper reviews the play "Habeas Corpus" by British playwright Alan Bennett. This two acts play, written in 1973 and set in the 1960s explores homosexuality.
Abstract This paper is based on the research article "Class Size in Primary School: Perceptions of Headteachers, Chairs of Governors, Teachers and Parents" by N. Bennett (1996), which helps clarify the perceptions of attitudes within education. The author points out that Bennett demonstrates the way models of research used within education do not resolve many of the critical debates over how information can be successfully transferred from educator to student. This paper draws upon the basic arguments made by Bennett to define and describe the gap between educational myths and findings in foundation research methods within education.
From the Paper "The increasingly standardized themes within Western education create the sense that researchers and activists within education have identified those traits that are successful in terms of enhancing the educational and cognitive developmental progress of students active in the system. Focuses on class size, standardized testing, and forms of classroom materials suggest that there are strategies which maximize effective conveyance of education from educator to student. Yet in assessing foundation research methods used within education, this image of widely-accepted and successful teaching strategies is not sustained. There is significant debate concerning which aspects of education are fundamental to student success."
Abstract This extensive paper compares "Northanger Abbey" by Jane Austen, "Louisa" by Elizabeth Herley, "The Mysteries of Udolpho" by Ann Radcliffe and "Silly Novels" by Lady Novelists by George Elliot. It analyzes their attitudes to women placing it in a historical context.
From the paper:
Jane Austen is often thought of as a writer whose works provide a refreshing and bracing antidote to the common literary themes of overheated romance and destiny. Her novels often revolve around the plot of two or three women who are unlucky, then lucky at love?but with an ironic twist that fundamentally deflates commonly accepted mores and notions of deeply held romantic cliches such as love at first sight. (In Austen's most famous novel, Pride and Prejudice, the main romantic hero and heroine, Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy hate rather than love one another at first sight.)"
From the Paper "In Lean and Mean Bennett Harrison, a political economist who specializes in corporate restructuring, argues that despite current talk to the contrary, it is still big companies who are responsible for creating new jobs (5). Small companies, according to Harrison's research, retain their traditional role as suppliers. The production and selling of central commodities which Harrison identifies as those visible in nearly every home, commodities such as television sets and cars, provides clues as to which industries will generate the most profit (6). What has begun to happen is that global networking has created the Grand Alliance with megacorporations such as Philips, Thomson, and NBC banding together to share technological and financial tips allowing them to increase the efficiency of their large scale..."
Abstract The paper shows that of all the courtships in the novel "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen, it is the match between Charlotte Lucas and Mr Collins which bears out the theme of practicality and acquisitiveness -their marriage is antithematic in its subversiveness. The paper explores how, in their failure to achieve true conjugal bliss, the Collins' show the emptiness of a marriage based upon financial considerations.
From the Paper "Mr. Collins is fully representative of the stereotypical man of fortune given by the narrator. Not that he is a man of an old great fortune, such as is Darcy, or a more recent fortune, as is Bingley. Collins has a fortune-to-be; the entailed estate of the Bennets will fall to him. Collins is entranced by the outer trappings of wealth and nobility. He is a sycophant to the upper classes, saying adoringly of Lady Catherine that "she is the sort of woman whom one cannot regard with too much deference" (193). Nonetheless, he is well off, and "having now a good house and very sufficient income, he intended to marry." He comes to Longbourne with "a wife in view" (114)."
From the Paper "BENNETT MECHANICAL COMPREHENSION TEST
Introduction
This research presents an evaluation of the Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test (BMCT). The findings of this examination are presented in relation to (1) test description, (2) purpose of the test and population target, (3) test norm population, (4) factors measured by the test, (5) test strengths and weaknesses, and (6) test reliability and validity.
Test Description
The first form of the BMCT was developed in 1940 (Bennett, 1969, p. 13). In 1947, the BMCT was included as one test in a test battery known as the Differential Aptitude Tests (Bennett, 1969, p. 13). A completely revised BMCT was issued in 1969 with two forms--S and T--of the instrument.
The most ..."
Abstract Jane Austen's novel "Pride and Prejudice" is structured around the theme of pride vs. prejudice, with characters showing aspects of each of these traits in their behavior and in their personalities. The paper examines how both major and minor characters reflect issues of pride and instances of prejudice as common characteristics that shape their actions, usually without their being at all aware of it. The paper shows how the terms "pride" and "prejudice" contrast, particularly as essential characteristics of Darcy (the proud) and Elizabeth (the prejudiced) as they learn to overcome their natural inclinations sufficiently to come together. The paper demonstrates how Austen does not simply present these characters as representatives of these character traits as would be found in an allegory. What Austen shows is that the society of the time is so guided by issues of pride and prejudice that real human connections are rare and to be prized.
From the Paper "Elizabeth Bennett is the intelligent heroine of this novel, but she is as guilty of self-absorption as any of the other characters in the novel, including Darcy. She has superior intelligence, and while she believes this places her above the error of prejudice, it does not. She has good reasons for rejecting Darcy at their first meeting. First, she is reacting to the actions of Mr. Wickham. Second, she refuses because Mr. Darcy separated Jane and Bingley. Third, although she is flattered by Darcy's proposal, she refuses because as he proposes, he allows his pride to come to the fore and so tells her that it would be degrading to be connected with her family. Here is where pride and prejudice clash directly, for Elizabeth is influenced here by her prejudice, which prevents her from understanding the nature of Darcy's pride. Her prejudice only begins to crumble when he writes an earnest letter to her and confesses that he did interfere between Jane and Bingley. He also reiterates to her his belief that Wickham is a bad character, and by now she agrees. Her prejudice then begins to disintegrate. Darcy is no longer too proud to see Elizabeth as a good catch, and she is no longer too prejudiced to understand his feelings."
