Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

The Case against Core Knowledge


The Case against Core Knowledge
An argument against the theory of core knowledge to explain infant cognitive development.
2,096 words (approx. 8.4 pages) | 8 sources | APA | 2008 United States


Paper Summary:

The paper discusses the core knowledge argument that basic knowledge in several realms of cognition is innate and not environmentally learned. The paper argues that however convincing this argument might be, it is based on dubious logic and assumptions. The paper asserts it is much more reasonable, in light of the available evidence, to assume that environmental factors are important in shaping and determining cognitive development.

From the Paper:

"The field of developmental psychology is in a state of flux over the issue of cognition and its emergence in human beings. Studies into the acquisition of knowledge have increasingly driven a wedge between researchers who argue that environmental inputs and learning are key to cognition, while others make the case for the existence of core knowledge. The core knowledge theorists argue convincingly that basic first knowledge in several realms of cognition--such as spatial reasoning--is hard-wired into the human brain. The suggestion is that this knowledge is innate, not environmentally learned, and therefore transmitted genetically (Lecuyer, 2006; Spelke and Kinzler, 2007). These theorists rely predominantly on studies with infants to describe what they believe is innate, core knowledge that is universal in the human species."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., and Spelke, E.S. (2006). Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 311, pp. 381-384.
  • Haith, M.M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), pp. 167-179.
  • Hespos, S.J. and Spelke, E.S. (2004, July 22). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430, pp. 453-456.
  • Hofsten, C., Feng, Q., and Spelke, E.S. (2000). Object representation and predictive action in infancy. Developmental Science, 3(2), pp. 193-205.
  • Hood, B. (2001). What do infants know about objects? Perception, 30(1), pp. 1281-1284.

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

The Case against Core Knowledge (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 14, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Argumentative-Essay-The-Case-against-Core-Knowledge/109636

MLA Citation:

"The Case against Core Knowledge" 15 January 2012. Web. 14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Argumentative-Essay-The-Case-against-Core-Knowledge/109636>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 39.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

cee-cee US
Publisher Since:
Aug 10, 2008
We are a writing company that has been in business for 15 years and have been submitting papers to AcaDemon for the last five plus years. Our papers cover a variety of topics because we have excellent writers capable of writing on a variety of topics. We specialize in research and can write all paper levels and all paper types.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success