Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

Peter Arnett's Treason


Peter Arnett's Treason
This paper rebuts the argument posed by John Podhoretz in the New York Post column and argues that journalist Peter Arnett is not guilty of treason in his reporting of the Iraqi war.
775 words (approx. 3.1 pages) | 1 source | MLA | 2002 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper discusses "Peter Arnett's Treason," an article by John Podhoretz, which discusses the potential danger that flawed reporting can have on the war effort as seen in Iraq.The paper reports that Podhoretz uses the Constitution to argue the case against Peter Arnett's actions, maintaining that it could be construed as treason and outlining the technical implications of this case with regards to the constitution and professional obligation. This author believes that Arnett is entitled to free speech within his constitutional right; in a profession where reporting the facts and adding analysis has far-reaching effects, Arnett erroneously offered personal opinion on the assumption that he was acting within his constitutional rights.

From the Paper:

"Furthermore, though Podhoretz is aware that Arnett can never be tried for treason with the added clarity to the definition of treason in modern times, he nevertheless implies that the logical and extra-legal factors make Arnett quite guilty of treason. To back this up, he gives us the example of how Arnett's attitude resembles those of Leonard Downie, the editor of The Washington Post, who says that he simply doesn't vote - because to vote would be to challenge his own objective approach to the news. Podhoretz ends by saying Arnett "is a revealer of truths to the world. And he will do so where, when and how he chooses" and he "made a choice that was, quite literally, criminal." [Podhoretz 2003]. It is clear from these statements that Arnett is a true reporter, far from being bias he has been objective throughout his career. If, according to Podhoretz, Arnett being objective is criminal; then, YES, he has committed a crime with those statements. Arnett's adherence to reporting discipline and integrity to both his country and profession cannot be doubted as anything but remarkable."

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

Peter Arnett's Treason (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 10, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Argumentative-Essay-Peter-Arnett's-Treason/27731

MLA Citation:

"Peter Arnett's Treason" 15 January 2012. Web. 10 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Argumentative-Essay-Peter-Arnett's-Treason/27731>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 16.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

academic US
Publisher Since:
Nov 13, 2003
I take a lot of pride in my writing and follow strict standards for producing quality written work. I thoroughly cite and document my sources, and check, proofread, and edit my papers to make sure the final product is of a high quality.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success