Nonviolent Resistance

Paper Summary:

This paper argues the position that nonviolent resistance is the only proper way to achieve social change. It concludes this is so because history has proven nonviolent resistance to be effective in different countries across the world. The paper examines the successes of this form of resistance in the case of Martin Luther King during the civil rights era and Ghandi in his drive for independence from the British in India. The paper argues that nonviolent resistance promotes dialog and compromise between the oppressed and the oppressor, thus making it an effective solution in promoting social change in Israel and bringing an end to the conflict.

From the Paper:

"It forces the oppressor to view their actions as they are seen by those who are oppressed. When non-violent resistance is used the oppressor is forced to see the way their actions affect the lives of the oppressed and how the oppressor can be affected greatly if social change does not occur. For instance during the civil rights era blacks boycotted buses which hurt the bus lines economically. In this instance the oppressor saw how not treating people fairly could hurt them economically. Ultimately the powers that be decided that they would rather treat people fairly than suffer economic losses. The oppressed demonstrated that they had power and that they would use it to effect change and social change occurred."

More papers on Nonviolent Resistance:

• Comparison Essay # 2897 : "Nonviolent Resistance"
• Comparison Essay # 62916 : "Political Protest and Passive Resistance"
• Essay # 49498 : "Martin Luther King and Nonviolence"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: