Humanitarian Disaster in Darfur
Humanitarian Disaster in Darfur
This paper assesses the humanitarian disaster in Darfur.
3,837 words (
approx. 15.3 pages) |
8 sources |
MLA | 2007
Paper Summary:
In this article, the writer looks at the history of Darfur and the difficult situation faced by the people in Darfur. The writer relates that the country where Darfur is situated is in Sudan and this was ruled by the United Kingdom till 1956. The writer notes that the country has not been free from natural and man made plagues like a bankrupt economy, war-ravaged lands, violent Islamic militancy and existing conflicts due to differences in religion, and culture and natural calamities like droughts and famines. The writer concludes that peace comes to human groups only when there is a certain amount of satisfaction of their expectations and the expectations vary from area to area and groups to groups. This is a part of what one may call culture.
Outline:
Introduction
Analysis
Conclusion
From the Paper:
"The cheapest method of getting these items from those countries was to occupy them and "rule" them. The objective of the "rule" was not to look after the well-being of the people ruled, but to ensure the smooth availability of the goods in demand by the West. However, it became essential after the Second World War for United Kingdom to grant freedom to these countries, not because they felt generous, but due to their inability to control those countries. The battle over the Suez Canal in neighboring Egypt bears testimony to this contention. The new rulers of Sudan were not the most enlightened as those people had been systematically butchered by the previous rulers in their interest to rule, but were the people who were most loyal to the previous rulers as this was felt to be a safe option for them to retire.
Ultimately, some of the companies of the ruling country still had "assets" in the ruled country, though they generally consisted of old and outdated plant and machinery, or pieces of land in the country ruled, or stocks of money of the ruled land. They would not permit the ruling elite to withdraw till their pound of flesh was ensured. While all this was going on, the unity of the countries that were left could not be ensured. In some cases, the departing rulers themselves broke up the country like India into India, Pakistan and later, Bangladesh."
Sample of Sources Used:
- Anderson, Norman G. (1999) "Sudan in crisis (c): The failure of Democracy" University Press of Florida.
- Awoniyi, Ola. (2004) "AU: Sudan troops poised for renewed offensive in Darfur" http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/sudan/?id=12180 Accessed 12 February, 2006
- Great Britain Foreign, Commonwealth Office. (2004) "Foreign and Commonwealth Office - Human Rights Annual Report 2004: Annual Report 2004" TSO Shop.
- Great Britain Parliament - House of Lords European Union Committee. (2005) "House of Lord European Union Committee, Current Developments in European foreign Policy" TSO Shop.
- Jok, Jok Madut. (2001) "Slavery in Sudan: Definitions and Outlines" University of Pennsylvania Press.
Humanitarian Disaster in Darfur (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 14, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Argumentative-Essay-Humanitarian-Disaster-in-Darfur/93027
"Humanitarian Disaster in Darfur" 15 January 2012. Web. 14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Argumentative-Essay-Humanitarian-Disaster-in-Darfur/93027>