Women in Ancient Tragedy and Comedy

Paper Summary:

Both the drama of Euripides' "Medea" and the comedy of Aristophanes' "Lysistrata" seem unique upon a level of even surface characterization, to even the most casual students of Classical Greek drama and culture. The paper shows that both are female-dominated plays that were produced by male-dominated societies and written by men. Both the drama and the comedy feature strong women as their central protagonists, whom are depicted under extreme circumstances, in relatively positive lights. The paper also shows that both plays, despite their very different tones, also have an additional, unique feature in that they show 'the enemy'-or the non-Greek or non-Athenian, in a fairly positive and humane fashion.

From the Paper:

"Medea's act of infanticide is far more shocking than any allegations in Aristophanes about the positive aspects of Greek unity. Unlike the withholding of sexual favors in the private sphere, Medea's act is a public act, in a world such as Greece where "women had no power: they were excluded from politics; from the army, navy, and war; from the law courts; from the Olympic and other Games; from agriculture and trade. In short, women were excluded from the male agonistic world of challenge and response, from what," was often seen as the "real world." (Arkins, 1997) Medea makes a claim as a woman for her status, now denied in the domestic sphere, as a cast off wife, in the public discourse of ruling the land."

More papers on Women in Ancient Tragedy and Comedy:

• Analytical Essay # 41374 : "Sexual Politics in Ancient Greece"
• Comparison Essay # 33030 : "Women in Ancient Societies"
• Analytical Essay # 2276 : "The Role of Women in Ancient Times"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: