This paper is a critical analysis of Keats' piece, "To Autumn". It also compares and contrasts the interpretation of the work by critics and the casual reader. The writer first analyzes the title and examines how this connects with the rest of the poem. It then takes the poem stanza by stanza and looks at the different ways that these can be read by both the layman and people experience in criticizing poetry.
From the Paper:
"When deciding on what poem to explicate, John Keats? To Autumn came to mind due to its seasonal theme and its lush lyric-like lines that roll off the tongue. When reading what poetry critics say about the poem, they seem more concerned about internal tension, imagery, and language. Certainly all of the poetical jargon and hoopla that gets critics excited has value, but more importantly are the critics getting enjoyment out of simply reading the poem as it stands. To the critics, all poems do not need to be dissected. The words can be read for what they are worth, and Keats? To Autumn is definitely a poem that can be read into very thoroughly, however it can also be enjoyed by the casual poetry reader."