Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

The Right to Bear Arms


# 114990
The Right to Bear Arms
An examination of the controversy surrounding the declaration of the right to bear arms by the Second Amendment of the US Constituion.
2,568 words (approx. 10.3 pages) | 8 sources | APA | 2009 United States


Paper Summary:

This paper analyzes the historical background of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution in order to uncover the true intention of its framers. The paper then presents the commonly advanced arguments by opponents and supporters of gun control laws.

Outline:
Historical Background of the Framing of the Second Amendment
Arguments in Favor of the Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms
Arguments for Gun Control and a Restrictive Application of 2nd Amendment

From the Paper:

"The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which declares: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" is perhaps the most controversial and misunderstood parts of the country's Constitution. The confusing language of the Amendment makes it open to differing interpretations and gives rise to a number of question, including: (a) Whether "the right to keep and bear arms" is a fundamental right that "shall not be infringed" by the States as well as the federal government; and (b) whether the right to bear arms is an individual right of all people or a collective right applicable only to a "well regulated Militia?" Opponents of gun control laws argue that restrictions imposed on keeping guns, whether enforced through state laws or federal laws, are a direct infringement on the fundamental right to bear arms guaranteed in the Constitution. Supporters of gun control, on the other hand, firmly believe that "right to keep and bear arms" referred to in the 2nd Amendment only applied to the militias that had existed in the 18th and 19th centuries whose functions have now been taken over by the police force and the national guards; therefore, the amendment has no relevance to the existing conditions and has become an anachronism."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Altman, A. (2008). "Gun Control Laws in the Cross Hairs." Time Magazine. March 19, 2008. Retrieved on March 21, 2008 from http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1723821,00.html
  • Browne, N.A. "The Myth of Nazi Gun Control." Guncite.com. 7/21/2001. Retrieved on March 21, 2008 from http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcnazimyth.html
  • Cramer, C. E. (1994). For the Defense of Themselves and the State: The Original Intent and Judicial Interpretation of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
  • Fezell, H.J. (2007). "Your Fundamental Right to Self-defense." Second Amendment.net. Retrieved on March 21, 2008 from http://www.secondamendment.net/2amd10.html
  • Sanford Levinson. (1989). "The Embarrassing Second Amendment" Yale Law Journal: 637-659

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

The Right to Bear Arms (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-The-Right-to-Bear-Arms/114990

MLA Citation:

"The Right to Bear Arms" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com/Analytical-Essay-The-Right-to-Bear-Arms/114990>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: $ 46.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

cee-cee US
Publisher Since:
Aug 10, 2008
We are a writing company that has been in business for 15 years and have been submitting papers to AcaDemon for the last five plus years. Our papers cover a variety of topics because we have excellent writers capable of writing on a variety of topics. We specialize in research and can write all paper levels and all paper types.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success