Paper Summary:

This analytical philosophy paper addresses Wittgenstein's method in relation to the debates with Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell early in his career. The paper addresses the focal point of the provided question on why Wittgenstein would reject psychology as closer to the natural sciences than philosophy. The paper also discusses the position of psychology within philosophy of knowledge; the relational and inductive method, as opposed to the reduction of today that, the paper maintains, Wittgenstein probably would not tolerate.

From the Paper:

"For Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951), the theory of knowledge would serve as the philosophy of psychology, avoiding altogether psychology's claims of belonging to the natural sciences. Much has to do with Wittgenstein's perception of the human mind and reality, in producing his argument in Tractacus. This paper examines why Wittgenstein would see psychology as a poor substitute for the philosophy of knowledge or the philosophy of mind, as driven by methodological and conceptual factors."

Visitors who viewed this Analytical Essay also liked these:

• Term Paper # 147542 : "The Foundations of Psychology"
• Essay # 21857 : " The Philosophy of Edmund Burke"
• Essay # 3147 : "Philosophy and Psychology"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: